Why play fairly when he can cheat?
Why play fairly when he can cheat?
Suggestion: reporters should ask the questions prosecutors have been prevented from asking in the now-dismissed cases.
Those questions are more important than ever.
Suggestion: reporters should ask the questions prosecutors have been prevented from asking in the now-dismissed cases.
Those questions are more important than ever.
"Did you accept the rulings of these courts?"
The crime was in continuing to ignore court rulings, lying about the evidence, and finding other questionable and illegal means to ignore the vote.
"Did you accept the rulings of these courts?"
The crime was in continuing to ignore court rulings, lying about the evidence, and finding other questionable and illegal means to ignore the vote.
"What was the president doing in the White House for three hours while the Capitol was under attack?"
"Is it legal for candidates to ask foreign governments for help in their campaigns?"
"What was the president doing in the White House for three hours while the Capitol was under attack?"
"Is it legal for candidates to ask foreign governments for help in their campaigns?"
In my experience, the best answers come when a witness is off balance. Short, sharp, penetrating questions do that.
In my experience, the best answers come when a witness is off balance. Short, sharp, penetrating questions do that.
The next best time is tomorrow.
Talk to your friends in the press.
The next best time is tomorrow.
Talk to your friends in the press.
Reporters need to ask the questions prosecutors have been prevented from asking him. They're more important than ever.
Reporters need to ask the questions prosecutors have been prevented from asking him. They're more important than ever.