Henning Deters
@detershenning.eupolicy.social.ap.brid.gy
Political scientist working mostly on European Union judicial politics -- but maintaining an unhealthily broad scope of interests. Mixed methods. Spoiled for R […]
🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://eupolicy.social/@DetersHenning, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://eupolicy.social/@DetersHenning, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
@ketanjoshi.co "Meeting CEOs" (aside: over coke).
December 16, 2025 at 2:36 PM
@ketanjoshi.co "Meeting CEOs" (aside: over coke).
@sauer_lauwarm Ich hab schon MoUs unterschrieben, in denen alle Parteien versichern, dass der Antragsteller (ich) Am Ende des letzten Kettenglieds die Institution wechselt.
December 16, 2025 at 11:57 AM
@sauer_lauwarm Ich hab schon MoUs unterschrieben, in denen alle Parteien versichern, dass der Antragsteller (ich) Am Ende des letzten Kettenglieds die Institution wechselt.
@sauer_lauwarm In der Tat. h/t @jasemrau
December 15, 2025 at 12:43 PM
@sauer_lauwarm In der Tat. h/t @jasemrau
December 15, 2025 at 11:11 AM
@stefan_hessbrueggen That is true. I doubt that this is what will happen.
December 15, 2025 at 11:07 AM
@stefan_hessbrueggen That is true. I doubt that this is what will happen.
1. Because we can totally trust ACME Chatbot Corp.
2. Busy reviewer B isn't going to admit to anything like that. Who could make them?
3. Even if reviewer B were to spend the time saved by "critically evaluating" LLM output, they have already been primed. Bias is unavoidable.
4. No solace for […]
2. Busy reviewer B isn't going to admit to anything like that. Who could make them?
3. Even if reviewer B were to spend the time saved by "critically evaluating" LLM output, they have already been primed. Bias is unavoidable.
4. No solace for […]
Original post on eupolicy.social
eupolicy.social
December 15, 2025 at 10:52 AM
1. Because we can totally trust ACME Chatbot Corp.
2. Busy reviewer B isn't going to admit to anything like that. Who could make them?
3. Even if reviewer B were to spend the time saved by "critically evaluating" LLM output, they have already been primed. Bias is unavoidable.
4. No solace for […]
2. Busy reviewer B isn't going to admit to anything like that. Who could make them?
3. Even if reviewer B were to spend the time saved by "critically evaluating" LLM output, they have already been primed. Bias is unavoidable.
4. No solace for […]
@sauer_lauwarm Wie Whatsapp nur ohne Whatsapp!
December 13, 2025 at 9:15 AM
@sauer_lauwarm Wie Whatsapp nur ohne Whatsapp!