“I understand your desire to write C but I cannot afford to write C when Rust is an option”

As far as I remember Anthropic recommends XML (and even those hacky parsers) for quite some time. So it might be Claude thing

One can also probably feed billions of people with insect protein from mosquitoes that live in Siberia

Any American mind sharing their thinking process on **this**?

It's a bit sad though AWS have probably the most challenging "try it out" out of all big LLM providers.
docs.aws.amazon.com/nova/latest/...

* There are typos in the examples (s/client/bedrock)
* Non-OpenAI like API (fixed by LiteLLM)
* Bruh

So called "static graph" corresponds to the process of embedding images into the html code. That is also the reason people use the word "embedding" so often now.

3. Structured outputs are awesome and make tremendous value in real business processes which involve "go / no go" constraints. You don't want to wiggle your way to include those constraints in prompt in English. Most software is deterministic, struct outputs help to blend LLMs with it.

2. It's not completely obvious how providers implement their "advanced" features like JSON mode. One needs to read the docs (obv) and play around with it to get a good grasp of how is it REALLY implemented.

Not with that attitude

Absolutely/Based

My outsider opinion is that EU have chosen societal stability (in all aspects, including significant freeze in social lifts) in exchange for dynamism. I do think it is deeply human to seek comfort and lack of surprises, so I do not think EU is dumb. But they will need to readjust in times of change.

Rustified apps are such a nice improvement of quality of life.

Also signifies that people *do* in fact care about performance despite all the "good enough performance is enough" affirmations.

uv makes python management really painless to a degree of it becoming non-issue at all.