I wish you guys recorded later so you could have gone into more than just the first 3 emails, but I guess there is always tomorrow.
November 13, 2025 at 4:27 AM
I wish you guys recorded later so you could have gone into more than just the first 3 emails, but I guess there is always tomorrow.
I cannot help but wonder, given how hard she apparently sold out in the last decade, did she EVER have any morals/ethics to begin with? Would a time traveling Megyn Kelly from the year 2015 want to slap the shit out of herself for sinking this low, or would she hug herself for grifting this hard?
November 13, 2025 at 4:22 AM
I cannot help but wonder, given how hard she apparently sold out in the last decade, did she EVER have any morals/ethics to begin with? Would a time traveling Megyn Kelly from the year 2015 want to slap the shit out of herself for sinking this low, or would she hug herself for grifting this hard?
Probably because you're not insufferable.
November 13, 2025 at 1:22 AM
Probably because you're not insufferable.
He'd have said TWO, but didn't want to steal one of his daddy's catchphrases.
November 13, 2025 at 1:19 AM
He'd have said TWO, but didn't want to steal one of his daddy's catchphrases.
I am all out of red string.
November 13, 2025 at 1:16 AM
I am all out of red string.
If you can't understand the important difference between Woodward releasing the information in October 2020 and releasing it in 2021, I can explain it *again*.
I am not saying the original error was intentional, just that it is an error that changes some context of the original criticism.
I am not saying the original error was intentional, just that it is an error that changes some context of the original criticism.
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 AM
If you can't understand the important difference between Woodward releasing the information in October 2020 and releasing it in 2021, I can explain it *again*.
I am not saying the original error was intentional, just that it is an error that changes some context of the original criticism.
I am not saying the original error was intentional, just that it is an error that changes some context of the original criticism.
The collective argument here seems to be that it is okay to spread false information about someone as long as you don't like that person.
Sorry, but I am not okay with that.
Sorry, but I am not okay with that.
November 13, 2025 at 1:07 AM
The collective argument here seems to be that it is okay to spread false information about someone as long as you don't like that person.
Sorry, but I am not okay with that.
Sorry, but I am not okay with that.
Someone claiming Woodward held onto it until 2021 is implying, intentionally or not, that Woodward held invaluable information from voters until after the election, which is even worse than just keeping for 8 months while people died, if only slightly.
(2/2)
(2/2)
November 13, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Someone claiming Woodward held onto it until 2021 is implying, intentionally or not, that Woodward held invaluable information from voters until after the election, which is even worse than just keeping for 8 months while people died, if only slightly.
(2/2)
(2/2)
But can we agree that 2021 is after the 2020 election?
Okay, so holding onto the information until 2021 (which Woodward didn't do) means Woodward would have held onto the information until after the election, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN WORSE than holding it for 6 months (which was also very bad). (1/2)
Okay, so holding onto the information until 2021 (which Woodward didn't do) means Woodward would have held onto the information until after the election, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN WORSE than holding it for 6 months (which was also very bad). (1/2)
November 13, 2025 at 12:54 AM
But can we agree that 2021 is after the 2020 election?
Okay, so holding onto the information until 2021 (which Woodward didn't do) means Woodward would have held onto the information until after the election, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN WORSE than holding it for 6 months (which was also very bad). (1/2)
Okay, so holding onto the information until 2021 (which Woodward didn't do) means Woodward would have held onto the information until after the election, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN WORSE than holding it for 6 months (which was also very bad). (1/2)
MAGA's *entire* fucking world must be collapsing right now.
November 13, 2025 at 12:41 AM
MAGA's *entire* fucking world must be collapsing right now.
You are really missing the point.
November 13, 2025 at 12:40 AM
You are really missing the point.
I can't tell you what to think about Woodward or his motives. I am just pointing out that he DID publish it in October 2020 (as in the month before the 2020 election) which IS BETTER THAN publishing it in 2021 (like the original poster claimed).
November 13, 2025 at 12:37 AM
I can't tell you what to think about Woodward or his motives. I am just pointing out that he DID publish it in October 2020 (as in the month before the 2020 election) which IS BETTER THAN publishing it in 2021 (like the original poster claimed).
How do you not know about Woodward's role in exposing Watergate?
November 13, 2025 at 12:31 AM
How do you not know about Woodward's role in exposing Watergate?
People are missing the fact that Woodward DID release the info right before the 2020 election, which IS BETTER than waiting until 2021 as the original poster claimed.
November 13, 2025 at 12:27 AM
People are missing the fact that Woodward DID release the info right before the 2020 election, which IS BETTER than waiting until 2021 as the original poster claimed.
He released the information and the audio tapes before the election, SO AT LEAST VOTERS KNEW ABOUT IT, is what I am saying. Yes, he absolutely should have released the information when he first got it. But to claim he held onto it until 2021 is condemning Woodward for something he didn't do.
November 13, 2025 at 12:26 AM
He released the information and the audio tapes before the election, SO AT LEAST VOTERS KNEW ABOUT IT, is what I am saying. Yes, he absolutely should have released the information when he first got it. But to claim he held onto it until 2021 is condemning Woodward for something he didn't do.
It may have been too late to save the lives Trump lost because of his denials, but to claim Woodward kept it a secret until after the election is just not true.
November 13, 2025 at 12:14 AM
It may have been too late to save the lives Trump lost because of his denials, but to claim Woodward kept it a secret until after the election is just not true.
Of course D'Souza still supports him, the crooked-ass motherfucker.
www.bbc.com/news/world-u...
www.bbc.com/news/world-u...
Trump pardons conservative writer Dinesh D'Souza
The author and commentator was convicted of making illegal campaign contributions of $20,000 in 2014.
www.bbc.com
November 13, 2025 at 12:08 AM
Of course D'Souza still supports him, the crooked-ass motherfucker.
www.bbc.com/news/world-u...
www.bbc.com/news/world-u...
Someone let them know that Bannon's connection to Epstein is on tape.
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
Jeffrey Epstein got media training from Steve Bannon for a '60 Minutes' interview that never happened, according to report
Bannon told him to "stick to his message ... that he is not a pedophile," and "not to share his racist theories on how Black people learn," per NYT.
www.businessinsider.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:38 PM
Someone let them know that Bannon's connection to Epstein is on tape.
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
The Woodward book in question came out in October 2020, though.
November 12, 2025 at 11:32 PM
The Woodward book in question came out in October 2020, though.
I am literally just hearing about this, but yeah. Video taped him and everything. Jesus Christ.
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
Jeffrey Epstein got media training from Steve Bannon for a '60 Minutes' interview that never happened, according to report
Bannon told him to "stick to his message ... that he is not a pedophile," and "not to share his racist theories on how Black people learn," per NYT.
www.businessinsider.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:28 PM
I am literally just hearing about this, but yeah. Video taped him and everything. Jesus Christ.
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
Gift that keeps on giving.
November 12, 2025 at 11:21 PM
Gift that keeps on giving.