Something like that. It’s even simpler. It is how lazy people justify consequences of laziness to think and find real-life solutions. It’s harder to build infrastructure and services, make things work and thrive, it is easier to blame we live too long or there are too many of us.

There is NO overpopulation. There is regionalisation for fear of one people to a big crowd of other people. Crazy thing.

It is NOT true. Overpopulation is that bullshit coming from fear of a small panicking coward mindset scared of primary competition with other people for resources. We’re no more there and we have just stupid use of resources and attempt to regulate everything. That became a wicked bottleneck.

6/6
120 years isn't fantasy. It's documented biology.

Making it routine changes incentive structures for everything: soil health, climate action, infrastructure, research.

Long-term thinking becomes self-interest, not sacrifice.

5/6
"But overpopulation!"

Wrong. Birth rates fall with development. Extended lifespan ≠ more people, just same people living their one life longer and healthier.

Plus: Regenerative agriculture can feed 15B+ with BETTER soil health and athmosphere than today.

4/6
Knowledge compounds differently:

Current: Expert retires at 65-70, knowledge mostly lost.
With 100-year healthspan: 60+ productive years. Knowledge deepens continuously.

Soil scientist with 70 years of field observations > seven scientists with 10 years each.

3/6
The real question: What happens when 100-year healthy lifespan becomes normal?

Agriculture example: Farmer at 50 expecting to farm productively at 90?

Suddenly 40-year soil health investment makes personal sense. Not altruism—self-interest.

2/6
Current reality: Life expectancy ~75-85 in developed countries.
Biological capacity: 120 years documented (Jeanne Calment, others).

Gap = underinvestment in healthspan, not biological limits.

We know what works: nutrition, exercise, stress management, preventative care.

When people expect centuries not decades, they become natural custodians of the future—because they’ll inhabit it. This unlocks everything else: sustainable thinking, transmitted expertise, reduced conflict, fundamentally new levels of human achievement. Time to take it seriously. 5/5

The work must begin now—freed from mythological fears like “overpopulation.” Reducing accidental deaths to near-zero and achieving biologically possible lifespans isn’t just about living longer. It’s about enabling wisdom to compound, relationships to deepen, civilizations to mature. 4/5

Too few startups, too little funding, too little serious discussion. We treat longevity research as fringe science rather than foundational infrastructure. Meanwhile, irreplaceable knowledge dies with every generation, conflicts stem from zero-sum time horizons. 3/5

Short lifespans create short-term thinking. People become less interested in 50-year research programs, mentorship traditions, or planetary stewardship when they won’t see the outcomes. We need people who expect to live through the consequences of today’s decisions. 2/5