democracyandtruth.bsky.social
@democracyandtruth.bsky.social
So you admit that Dr's can disagree ? But when one doesn't cite their source and the other does . What usually happens from there ? Even as you're a troll you're so close to a breakthrough little bro.
January 14, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Who built the technology? Oooo right a engineer had to understand the field and build it themselves. Therfore they are genetic engineers. Jesus bro someone had to understand the field to build the tech... do you not understand this ?
January 14, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Engineering is applied science of those fields little bro. You're almost to the answer. Like you're almost alble to recognize the issue is your reading skills not mine.
January 14, 2025 at 9:44 PM
I don't need your approval to feel or think I'm smart. My reading comprehension above yours tells me that. Come back with a source again or stfu. Proof ? Not in your text books lmao
January 14, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Never said that there wasn't a specific field. You said engineers were not genetic scientist in which I argued back that it's a field of engineering. Want your own words in screen capture?
January 14, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Dr's do agree with each other * idk why it put don't. Either way my point stands that you're arguing fallacies as I have provided proof. Your "proof " is one dr saying something without any proof. I think I'll believe the research ty very much.
January 14, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Before you go. How come medical opinions exist if everyone agrees on one thing medically? You're assuming that Dr's don't agree with each other . Which just goes to show you've never had an intelligent conversation with a Dr before.
January 14, 2025 at 9:37 PM
You had to use an alt account just to attack me and still get made to look dumb. Anyone with a brain will realize you are wrong as you claim a study didn't even measure the brain scans properly. Without even being a Dr yourself. Hypocrite much ?
January 14, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Good luck looking dumb when you show them where you say genetic engineering isn't engineering. Also when you can't quote a single source but I've provided 3 now ? Want to make it 4 ? Tag them let them see the whole conversation. But you won't.
January 14, 2025 at 9:33 PM
That's crazy bro. Ever heard of genetic engineering?
January 14, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Nature already did.you just deny it. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
did.you
January 14, 2025 at 9:18 PM
So no proof to counter act my argument even with me citing sources that can be countered ? An engineer can't be a scientist about genetics since when ? My plane design worked well for the military.. on the other hand she claimed and you claimed.. you both claim but speak nothing more.
January 14, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Want countless more? I can provide you proof to my conclusion . You on the other hand have only insulted me. You said leave science to the real scientist so I argued back " that I cited evidence like one ". As in a scientist to your perception. Provide proof to back her up or ???
January 14, 2025 at 8:53 PM
I cited sources like a real scientist. She got scared I started providing proof of my stance. Different story little one.
January 14, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Word of advice. Don't enter a boxing ring without gloves. Please try harder to understand what I'm saying...
January 14, 2025 at 7:41 PM
Crazy how you just proved yourself uneducated. Tell me ... what links can you provide that prove me wrong? www.nature.com/articles/s41...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
January 14, 2025 at 7:40 PM
January 14, 2025 at 6:59 PM
When you're too stupid to know that you're wrong so you insult me. Just know I don't talk without knowing I'm correct.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
January 14, 2025 at 6:58 PM