linktr.ee/demidevilqueen
But I just think it's obvious Joel's an academic nerd, and anyone using the methodology incorrectly towards a topic that is already full of misinformation, would make an academic nerd annoyed.
But I just think it's obvious Joel's an academic nerd, and anyone using the methodology incorrectly towards a topic that is already full of misinformation, would make an academic nerd annoyed.
Your gonna drop that BnB and you need to be okay with an online stranger thinking you're a idiot stinky goober, if you want to be free
Your gonna drop that BnB and you need to be okay with an online stranger thinking you're a idiot stinky goober, if you want to be free
But people with niche interests and passions... get weirdly emotional about them. It's part of having interests.
But people with niche interests and passions... get weirdly emotional about them. It's part of having interests.
I agree with the authors views on relationship red flags. But I do not think the way they wrote the text is compelling or true to the data provided.
Like there's not much else to say.
I agree with the authors views on relationship red flags. But I do not think the way they wrote the text is compelling or true to the data provided.
Like there's not much else to say.
And B: that complexity is also on display in the same research the author linked, lol.
If you actually look through it, it's not just a study about men and women. It also includes race, sexuality, income, politics.
And B: that complexity is also on display in the same research the author linked, lol.
If you actually look through it, it's not just a study about men and women. It also includes race, sexuality, income, politics.
The issue is the author is not presenting an opinion. They assert a hyptotheis has been solved, with data to prove it... and the data does not.
The issue is the author is not presenting an opinion. They assert a hyptotheis has been solved, with data to prove it... and the data does not.
The entire point of the critique up top was the authors method of reaching a conclusion and how they sourced thr information to justify it.
The entire point of the critique up top was the authors method of reaching a conclusion and how they sourced thr information to justify it.
Men and women ages 18-39 have almost identical evals in that section.
That 30/60 split between men and women is specifically coming from people 40+. It's skewing the averages quite a bit.
Men and women ages 18-39 have almost identical evals in that section.
That 30/60 split between men and women is specifically coming from people 40+. It's skewing the averages quite a bit.
I think for me it was in gradeschool lol
I think for me it was in gradeschool lol
Even if we were using vibes as a source, I don't see why "mankeeping" would ever be a sole variable in this shift.
Even if we were using vibes as a source, I don't see why "mankeeping" would ever be a sole variable in this shift.
I don't think fighting is inherently valid or anything. But the venue and thr culture around UFC leans that way at times.
I don't think fighting is inherently valid or anything. But the venue and thr culture around UFC leans that way at times.