martind
banner
dekstop.bsky.social
martind
@dekstop.bsky.social
Don't freestyle much but I write 'em like such
Our publisher @plutopress.bsky.social surveyed their authors whether their published work should be licensed to train large language models. 15% responded "Yes", 41% responded "No", 30% responded "Maybe", depending on how the data is used. Full report: www.plutobooks.com/wp-content/u...
September 17, 2025 at 8:48 PM
(Caption: screen recording of a chat session with the prompt: "say the time". The LLM abides: it requests to run the "say" shell command with an inline call to "date". User approves, computer reads out the time using MacOS speech synthesis.)
September 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM
September 13, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Playing with fire: my local LLMs can now run web searches, read local files, execute Python code, and run shell commands (in LM Studio with local MCP server)
September 12, 2025 at 6:01 PM
For reference, here the original schematic before I asked it for some corrections
July 7, 2025 at 12:32 PM
So happy, ChatGPT helped me design a bipolar power supply, the schematic looks very professional. And so efficient -- who knew that a single line could supply both the positive and negative rail!
July 7, 2025 at 12:23 PM
June 3, 2025 at 10:36 AM
May 29, 2025 at 4:54 PM
May 19, 2025 at 6:17 PM
April 29, 2025 at 7:13 AM
Many good sections, but take particular note of the simple conclusion at the end!
April 22, 2025 at 4:54 PM
Have officially begun the Charlie Brown Christmas season. The instrumental version for now because I'm not a loon
November 5, 2024 at 3:23 PM
How it's going
August 31, 2024 at 4:07 PM
Exceptional discussion in the FT of the mechanics of riots, drawing from decades of social research incl 2011 riots in the UK archive.ph/PONGF
August 9, 2024 at 11:20 AM
My still on Twitter / not quite actually on Twitter conundrum has just resolved itself, my account failed their new mandatory age verification. Finally free!
July 29, 2024 at 2:18 PM
May 6, 2024 at 9:57 AM
Is AI even worth it? @molly.wiki shares her observations so far www.citationneeded.news/ai-isnt-usel...
April 17, 2024 at 4:30 PM
An AI UX paradigm -- software that writes itself in response to user input?
April 14, 2024 at 8:28 PM
PS here its initial answer before I added brackets to avoid an apparent confusion about operator precedence. I suppose this one is at least arguable, if maybe a cop-out
April 10, 2024 at 7:44 PM
Here a recently released state of the art LLM that claims to beat GPT-4. (Once more, the answer is incorrect.)
April 10, 2024 at 7:40 PM
Built an AI to help me navigate my vinyl collection 🤖 Now how can I get it to do my dishes

(It's RAG over my Discogs collection plus MusicBrainz metadata. An embeddings lookup plus GPT for filtering/enrichment.)
April 7, 2024 at 9:28 PM
GPT4 reportedly executes Python to evaluate mathematical expressions, but most LLMs don't (yet). I've found the following expression useful to test if a model can do maths -- none of the results shown here are correct.
April 1, 2024 at 11:16 AM
Post scriptum
March 15, 2024 at 6:59 PM
TLDR: Current-generation LLM based AI is best thought of as an assistive technology. It can improve the efficiency of an analyst. But it can only enhance human analytical thought, it cannot replace it.*

* ... except maybe in scenarios where the cost of a wrong judgment is tolerably low?
March 15, 2024 at 6:58 PM
I also wonder if this might nudge current gen AI closer to the trough of disillusionment of the Gartner hype cycle: towards the disappointing realisation that human involvement and specialist knowledge is still needed to produce meaningful outputs.
March 15, 2024 at 6:52 PM