DeJenerate🎻🐨📚
@dejenerate.bsky.social
You can call me Jen.
Living on Anaiwan Country.
Not becoming more conservative with age, just the opposite.
Older, poorer, more disgusted than ever with RWNJs, especially those in charge of governments. Diehard atheist.
Living on Anaiwan Country.
Not becoming more conservative with age, just the opposite.
Older, poorer, more disgusted than ever with RWNJs, especially those in charge of governments. Diehard atheist.
I prefer 25 or 6 to 4.
November 20, 2025 at 2:30 AM
I prefer 25 or 6 to 4.
They are so predictable 😐
November 19, 2025 at 7:58 AM
They are so predictable 😐
No frolicking in this universe either.
November 19, 2025 at 7:45 AM
No frolicking in this universe either.
A meta-abomination.
'Art' in the era of Epstein and Trump.
Irony has eaten itself.
'Art' in the era of Epstein and Trump.
Irony has eaten itself.
November 19, 2025 at 7:30 AM
A meta-abomination.
'Art' in the era of Epstein and Trump.
Irony has eaten itself.
'Art' in the era of Epstein and Trump.
Irony has eaten itself.
She could change her name to Jesus to broaden her appeal to men and to the Christian lobby.
November 19, 2025 at 4:17 AM
She could change her name to Jesus to broaden her appeal to men and to the Christian lobby.
I'd feel bitter too if I had to drink that.
November 18, 2025 at 10:30 AM
I'd feel bitter too if I had to drink that.
I get a craving every couple of years for a Chiko Roll. It's as though I haven't felt violently ill on any of the previous occasions.
A cheesecake would be a far more benign substitute.
A cheesecake would be a far more benign substitute.
November 18, 2025 at 10:28 AM
I get a craving every couple of years for a Chiko Roll. It's as though I haven't felt violently ill on any of the previous occasions.
A cheesecake would be a far more benign substitute.
A cheesecake would be a far more benign substitute.
And still they don't get it!
None of us gives a toss about their leadership, federally or in the states.
It's their crappy policies, primarily energy, but take your pick, and unacknowledged RWNJ, racist, Trumpian tendencies.
They want a return to the racist, sexist 1950s when we all knew our place.
None of us gives a toss about their leadership, federally or in the states.
It's their crappy policies, primarily energy, but take your pick, and unacknowledged RWNJ, racist, Trumpian tendencies.
They want a return to the racist, sexist 1950s when we all knew our place.
November 18, 2025 at 8:52 AM
And still they don't get it!
None of us gives a toss about their leadership, federally or in the states.
It's their crappy policies, primarily energy, but take your pick, and unacknowledged RWNJ, racist, Trumpian tendencies.
They want a return to the racist, sexist 1950s when we all knew our place.
None of us gives a toss about their leadership, federally or in the states.
It's their crappy policies, primarily energy, but take your pick, and unacknowledged RWNJ, racist, Trumpian tendencies.
They want a return to the racist, sexist 1950s when we all knew our place.
I switched from iPhone which was supposedly too old and bit the bullet to go Android. No dramas in adapting. I am so happy with my Google Pixel 8a, purchased when my Google 4a was lost. Seven years of software support guaranteed.
Newest premium version is Pixel 10 Pro.
Newest premium version is Pixel 10 Pro.
November 18, 2025 at 8:02 AM
I switched from iPhone which was supposedly too old and bit the bullet to go Android. No dramas in adapting. I am so happy with my Google Pixel 8a, purchased when my Google 4a was lost. Seven years of software support guaranteed.
Newest premium version is Pixel 10 Pro.
Newest premium version is Pixel 10 Pro.
So the Epstein files contain the nuclear codes?
That kind of national security?
Or perhaps the kind of "national security" that might expose pedophiles in high places?
That kind of national security?
Or perhaps the kind of "national security" that might expose pedophiles in high places?
November 18, 2025 at 5:33 AM
So the Epstein files contain the nuclear codes?
That kind of national security?
Or perhaps the kind of "national security" that might expose pedophiles in high places?
That kind of national security?
Or perhaps the kind of "national security" that might expose pedophiles in high places?
The term "pro-life" does not apply to anyone who is actually alive.
November 18, 2025 at 4:34 AM
The term "pro-life" does not apply to anyone who is actually alive.
Why wouldn't we be?
The US has become a subject of ridicule, fear and distrust.
Trump is utterly reviled by 99% of the population.
The US has become a subject of ridicule, fear and distrust.
Trump is utterly reviled by 99% of the population.
November 18, 2025 at 4:00 AM
Why wouldn't we be?
The US has become a subject of ridicule, fear and distrust.
Trump is utterly reviled by 99% of the population.
The US has become a subject of ridicule, fear and distrust.
Trump is utterly reviled by 99% of the population.
Doesn't he have minders to keep him away from the public?
That a person with such obvious impairment is allowed to display their mental state is surprising enough - that he is still POTUS is absolutely fucking terrifying!!!
Letting him loose cannot be accidental.
Regime change must be imminent.
That a person with such obvious impairment is allowed to display their mental state is surprising enough - that he is still POTUS is absolutely fucking terrifying!!!
Letting him loose cannot be accidental.
Regime change must be imminent.
November 18, 2025 at 3:51 AM
Doesn't he have minders to keep him away from the public?
That a person with such obvious impairment is allowed to display their mental state is surprising enough - that he is still POTUS is absolutely fucking terrifying!!!
Letting him loose cannot be accidental.
Regime change must be imminent.
That a person with such obvious impairment is allowed to display their mental state is surprising enough - that he is still POTUS is absolutely fucking terrifying!!!
Letting him loose cannot be accidental.
Regime change must be imminent.
Indeed.
She will bust a gut trying to make the party appear more palatable to women, then get booted out before the next election for failing to pander to the far-right males of the party. She will be deemed to be weak and unelectable.
She will bust a gut trying to make the party appear more palatable to women, then get booted out before the next election for failing to pander to the far-right males of the party. She will be deemed to be weak and unelectable.
November 18, 2025 at 3:13 AM
Indeed.
She will bust a gut trying to make the party appear more palatable to women, then get booted out before the next election for failing to pander to the far-right males of the party. She will be deemed to be weak and unelectable.
She will bust a gut trying to make the party appear more palatable to women, then get booted out before the next election for failing to pander to the far-right males of the party. She will be deemed to be weak and unelectable.
Women have mastered the eyelash curler, eyeliner and mascara brushes, and home waxing.
This klutz has the gall to want to ban women from combat roles.
Just who does he think is physically and mentally tougher and more skilled?
Perhaps he is in the wrong job. He could retrain to become a busboy.
This klutz has the gall to want to ban women from combat roles.
Just who does he think is physically and mentally tougher and more skilled?
Perhaps he is in the wrong job. He could retrain to become a busboy.
November 18, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Women have mastered the eyelash curler, eyeliner and mascara brushes, and home waxing.
This klutz has the gall to want to ban women from combat roles.
Just who does he think is physically and mentally tougher and more skilled?
Perhaps he is in the wrong job. He could retrain to become a busboy.
This klutz has the gall to want to ban women from combat roles.
Just who does he think is physically and mentally tougher and more skilled?
Perhaps he is in the wrong job. He could retrain to become a busboy.