Que malaise il y avis dans Le Figaro??

Naturally this is just off the top of my head and a full on, honest debate would be needed to iron the kinks out, but it can absolutely be done.
Cheers!

AI trip whereas it would be relatively easy for a human to not be tripped. Most importantly, this exam should check if the AI is capable of discerning when a human lawyer is actually needed. At that point, the competition would shift to accuracy and ability, just like a human lawyer.

To determine whether there is sufficient information to pursue a suit mostly automatically or if, instead, you need an actual lawyer. Obviously, the AI itself should be able to qualify at the bar exam for the State where they want to practice and the test should be crafted in such a way to make the

After a few years of this and constant feeding of technical journals and refinement of the weighting and you have an automatic lawyer. What can this lawyer do? All your run-of-the-mill things such as opposing a ticket or a fine that doesn’t require excessive nuance. The AI should therefore be able

*as long as* it’s done properly. In this case “done properly” means a real lawyer oversees the results of the generated text and then an opposition AI is fed the “correct” text to check against the one generated by the first AI. This is a very common way to address learning and proven in the field.

Please correct me if I’m wrong but I kind of remember that interplanetary water (and that on other planets, as well) has some fundamental difference with that on planet Earth. Am I tripping??