Still just Deensey
@deensey.bsky.social
Neurodivergent, queer Canastralian (she/they) likes comics, reading, making things and colourful earrings
I think you have the same computer as a colleague
November 21, 2025 at 4:31 AM
I think you have the same computer as a colleague
Reposted by Still just Deensey
Because these chemicals can linger in water, soil, and even the human body. The public will have less data about potential exposure. The EPA will take public comments for 45 days before deciding whether to finalize the new exemptions.
EPA Proposes Changes to Make PFAS Reporting Requirements More Practical and Implementable, Reducing Regulatory Burden | US EPA
EPA released a proposal to improve the scope of its PFAS reporting regulations under TSCA to make them more practical and implementable and reduce unnecessary, or potentially duplicative, reporting re...
www.epa.gov
November 11, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Because these chemicals can linger in water, soil, and even the human body. The public will have less data about potential exposure. The EPA will take public comments for 45 days before deciding whether to finalize the new exemptions.
Reposted by Still just Deensey
finished goods that simply contain PFAS, such as clothing or cookware. The agency says this change would reduce costs for businesses.
Loosening the rules could hide important information about where PFAS are used and how they spread.
Loosening the rules could hide important information about where PFAS are used and how they spread.
November 11, 2025 at 10:10 PM
finished goods that simply contain PFAS, such as clothing or cookware. The agency says this change would reduce costs for businesses.
Loosening the rules could hide important information about where PFAS are used and how they spread.
Loosening the rules could hide important information about where PFAS are used and how they spread.