Gino
@debunker13.bsky.social
Lifelong learner who believes in challenging assumptions and beliefs. Discomfort = growth. Won’t block you, will push back; expect the same from you.
The "knew about the girls" email ≠ Thanksgiving 2017 claim. In that email Epstein wrote Trump was aware of recruiting at Mar-a-Lago and told them to stop. That's damning, and doesn't exonerate Trump.
Two different things. One supported by evidence, one not. Both deserve answers.
#ReleaseEpsteinFiles
Two different things. One supported by evidence, one not. Both deserve answers.
#ReleaseEpsteinFiles
November 15, 2025 at 5:35 PM
The "knew about the girls" email ≠ Thanksgiving 2017 claim. In that email Epstein wrote Trump was aware of recruiting at Mar-a-Lago and told them to stop. That's damning, and doesn't exonerate Trump.
Two different things. One supported by evidence, one not. Both deserve answers.
#ReleaseEpsteinFiles
Two different things. One supported by evidence, one not. Both deserve answers.
#ReleaseEpsteinFiles
True. Once misinformation spreads, corrections rarely catch up.
That's why: verify before sharing, call out errors when you see them (like this thread did), and don't let partisan loyalty override fact-checking.
Yes, Dems screwed up, but corrected it. Now let’s apply that standard everywhere.
That's why: verify before sharing, call out errors when you see them (like this thread did), and don't let partisan loyalty override fact-checking.
Yes, Dems screwed up, but corrected it. Now let’s apply that standard everywhere.
November 15, 2025 at 4:45 PM
True. Once misinformation spreads, corrections rarely catch up.
That's why: verify before sharing, call out errors when you see them (like this thread did), and don't let partisan loyalty override fact-checking.
Yes, Dems screwed up, but corrected it. Now let’s apply that standard everywhere.
That's why: verify before sharing, call out errors when you see them (like this thread did), and don't let partisan loyalty override fact-checking.
Yes, Dems screwed up, but corrected it. Now let’s apply that standard everywhere.
When does it stop being explainable? But we’re not the audience. This is episode 5 in a 10 episode series. All ‘emergencies’ are part of 10 episode cycles to keep their followers engaged. Governing is the subplot. Engagement is the plot. This isn’t politics. This is content creation.
November 15, 2025 at 5:42 AM
When does it stop being explainable? But we’re not the audience. This is episode 5 in a 10 episode series. All ‘emergencies’ are part of 10 episode cycles to keep their followers engaged. Governing is the subplot. Engagement is the plot. This isn’t politics. This is content creation.
Try Linux Mint (cinnamon) it’s even leaner.
November 15, 2025 at 5:22 AM
Try Linux Mint (cinnamon) it’s even leaner.
Yes, Dems posting then deleting was embarrassing and damaged cred.
The difference: they deleted it when shown to be wrong.
Now apply that same standard to Trump's "Epstein hoax" claims, the verified emails show Epstein writing that Trump "knew about the girls."
Willingly dishonest cuts both ways.
The difference: they deleted it when shown to be wrong.
Now apply that same standard to Trump's "Epstein hoax" claims, the verified emails show Epstein writing that Trump "knew about the girls."
Willingly dishonest cuts both ways.
November 15, 2025 at 5:06 AM
Yes, Dems posting then deleting was embarrassing and damaged cred.
The difference: they deleted it when shown to be wrong.
Now apply that same standard to Trump's "Epstein hoax" claims, the verified emails show Epstein writing that Trump "knew about the girls."
Willingly dishonest cuts both ways.
The difference: they deleted it when shown to be wrong.
Now apply that same standard to Trump's "Epstein hoax" claims, the verified emails show Epstein writing that Trump "knew about the girls."
Willingly dishonest cuts both ways.
You’re intellectually honest, an outstanding citizen with impeccable moral standing, you believe truth can be found, and are working towards a true understanding of what goes on around you. Unless I mistook you for someone else entirely.
November 14, 2025 at 9:31 PM
You’re intellectually honest, an outstanding citizen with impeccable moral standing, you believe truth can be found, and are working towards a true understanding of what goes on around you. Unless I mistook you for someone else entirely.
Nobel Peace Prize goes to Venezuelan opposition leader.
Suddenly there's a secret memo authorizing boat strikes in the Caribbean based on Trump's cartel claims.
I'm sure the timing and location are pure coincidence. 🙃
Declarations of war are the domain of Congress. Not secret memos.
Suddenly there's a secret memo authorizing boat strikes in the Caribbean based on Trump's cartel claims.
I'm sure the timing and location are pure coincidence. 🙃
Declarations of war are the domain of Congress. Not secret memos.
November 14, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Nobel Peace Prize goes to Venezuelan opposition leader.
Suddenly there's a secret memo authorizing boat strikes in the Caribbean based on Trump's cartel claims.
I'm sure the timing and location are pure coincidence. 🙃
Declarations of war are the domain of Congress. Not secret memos.
Suddenly there's a secret memo authorizing boat strikes in the Caribbean based on Trump's cartel claims.
I'm sure the timing and location are pure coincidence. 🙃
Declarations of war are the domain of Congress. Not secret memos.
"Comments available to people I follow" = curated audience
"Some are liberal" = token dissent
"You proved why I restrict" = admitting you fear scrutiny
You just gave a masterclass in echo chamber construction. Couldn't have scripted it better if I’d tried. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"Some are liberal" = token dissent
"You proved why I restrict" = admitting you fear scrutiny
You just gave a masterclass in echo chamber construction. Couldn't have scripted it better if I’d tried. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
November 14, 2025 at 8:08 PM
"Comments available to people I follow" = curated audience
"Some are liberal" = token dissent
"You proved why I restrict" = admitting you fear scrutiny
You just gave a masterclass in echo chamber construction. Couldn't have scripted it better if I’d tried. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"Some are liberal" = token dissent
"You proved why I restrict" = admitting you fear scrutiny
You just gave a masterclass in echo chamber construction. Couldn't have scripted it better if I’d tried. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We’re now in episode 6/7 (of 10) territory. A few more days before another manufactured crisis and the narrative changes again.
November 14, 2025 at 7:53 PM
We’re now in episode 6/7 (of 10) territory. A few more days before another manufactured crisis and the narrative changes again.
You just demonstrated exactly what I described: closed comments to protect followers from “stupidity” (aka contrary evidence), but monitoring closely enough to respond when criticized.
The protective echo chamber in action. Thanks for proving my point.
The protective echo chamber in action. Thanks for proving my point.
November 14, 2025 at 4:29 AM
You just demonstrated exactly what I described: closed comments to protect followers from “stupidity” (aka contrary evidence), but monitoring closely enough to respond when criticized.
The protective echo chamber in action. Thanks for proving my point.
The protective echo chamber in action. Thanks for proving my point.
When does it stop being explainable? But we’re not their audience. This is episode 5 in a 10 episode series. All ‘emergencies’ are part of 10 episode cycles to keep their followers engaged. Governing is the subplot. Engagement is the plot. This isn’t politics. This is content creation.
November 14, 2025 at 4:21 AM
When does it stop being explainable? But we’re not their audience. This is episode 5 in a 10 episode series. All ‘emergencies’ are part of 10 episode cycles to keep their followers engaged. Governing is the subplot. Engagement is the plot. This isn’t politics. This is content creation.
Closed comments is significant. It means:
• They know their claims can’t withstand scrutiny
• They’re not interested in dialogue or truth
• They’re creating propaganda, not starting conversations
• They’re protecting their followers (and ego) from contrary evidence
• They know their claims can’t withstand scrutiny
• They’re not interested in dialogue or truth
• They’re creating propaganda, not starting conversations
• They’re protecting their followers (and ego) from contrary evidence
November 14, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Closed comments is significant. It means:
• They know their claims can’t withstand scrutiny
• They’re not interested in dialogue or truth
• They’re creating propaganda, not starting conversations
• They’re protecting their followers (and ego) from contrary evidence
• They know their claims can’t withstand scrutiny
• They’re not interested in dialogue or truth
• They’re creating propaganda, not starting conversations
• They’re protecting their followers (and ego) from contrary evidence
He used his infamous “National Security” wording in the post; guess we know what card he’s going to try and play. 🤔🤨 but this wouldn’t have been an issue if consequences had been thought of BEFORE imploding your country.
November 12, 2025 at 4:35 PM
He used his infamous “National Security” wording in the post; guess we know what card he’s going to try and play. 🤔🤨 but this wouldn’t have been an issue if consequences had been thought of BEFORE imploding your country.
Not mine; but worth posting here.
November 5, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Not mine; but worth posting here.
Are you saying this is or isn’t in line with the Immaculate Conception, or this is a progression and further understanding?
November 5, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Are you saying this is or isn’t in line with the Immaculate Conception, or this is a progression and further understanding?
I do wonder if this only happened because of the criticism. Power protects power; seeing that in the US right now. And what exactly has he lost? Some titles and a rented house!?? He still stays on royal property, just gets another set of digs.
November 3, 2025 at 8:22 AM
I do wonder if this only happened because of the criticism. Power protects power; seeing that in the US right now. And what exactly has he lost? Some titles and a rented house!?? He still stays on royal property, just gets another set of digs.
Not what he said at all, though you did provide one interpretation. Look at it like this:
Religion: do not kill
Gen Z Catholic: I’m not killing when I: (slander, defame, ignore the needy…)
Result: takes the literal meaning and misses broader intent. Context cannot be understood outside of community.
Religion: do not kill
Gen Z Catholic: I’m not killing when I: (slander, defame, ignore the needy…)
Result: takes the literal meaning and misses broader intent. Context cannot be understood outside of community.
October 31, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Not what he said at all, though you did provide one interpretation. Look at it like this:
Religion: do not kill
Gen Z Catholic: I’m not killing when I: (slander, defame, ignore the needy…)
Result: takes the literal meaning and misses broader intent. Context cannot be understood outside of community.
Religion: do not kill
Gen Z Catholic: I’m not killing when I: (slander, defame, ignore the needy…)
Result: takes the literal meaning and misses broader intent. Context cannot be understood outside of community.
Or is this just public pressure affecting policy? Power protects power.
October 31, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Or is this just public pressure affecting policy? Power protects power.
La profundidad de campo aquí es físicamente imposible. Para captar la luna con ese nivel de detalle necesitas teleobjetivo largo, que desenfocaría completamente las nubes en primer plano. Esto es claramente generado por IA.
October 30, 2025 at 6:09 PM
La profundidad de campo aquí es físicamente imposible. Para captar la luna con ese nivel de detalle necesitas teleobjetivo largo, que desenfocaría completamente las nubes en primer plano. Esto es claramente generado por IA.
I would tend to agree, except I see AI as just another creative tool in the pantheon of creative tools. I agree some people shouldn’t have access to it: Musk, Trump, MAGAts in general. But the rest of us need to be able to use what’s at our disposal to keep democracy alive.
October 28, 2025 at 2:32 AM
I would tend to agree, except I see AI as just another creative tool in the pantheon of creative tools. I agree some people shouldn’t have access to it: Musk, Trump, MAGAts in general. But the rest of us need to be able to use what’s at our disposal to keep democracy alive.