Every source Charnwood cites confirms domestic solid-fuel burning contributes to measurable PM2.5 health impacts. They selectively interpret the reports, emphasising uncertainty & test-bench stove performance while downplaying real-world emissions, exposure, & cumulative risk.
3/3

For a start, the headline is an answer to a strawman. Nobody has said modern stoves are causing 2,500 deaths. What they have said is that all wood burning, which modern stoves are a part of, have caused 2,500 "attributable deaths” 1/3

They are both heating appliances. That's very clear from the fact that you put the word "heat(s)" in both definitions.

A gas boiler can heat one room as well.

Carry on selling that smoke!

The article downplays well-established health risks from air pollution, misrepresents public health estimates, and reframes legitimate research as propaganda All consistent with the author's commercial interest in defending wood stoves.

What the f*ck are you talking about?

More #StoveIndustryLies from Jason.

Clean-air advocacy is about improving health and modernising heating. The focus is on phasing in cleaner systems, protecting vulnerable households, and maintaining warmth and resilience while reducing pollution.

You are the problem Jason.

The only hysteria is from the stove industry, who are unable to look at the facts.
When they are shown the facts, they just block, rather than engaging.
Like you've blocked our account, on the other site.

I bet you block me, and don't reply to this statement.