@deaconpmp.bsky.social
That is exactly the point. These are NOT officers, they're obviously NOT following legal precedent, so I dont expect they had to even touch a civil servants examination.
June 19, 2025 at 4:08 PM
That is exactly the point. These are NOT officers, they're obviously NOT following legal precedent, so I dont expect they had to even touch a civil servants examination.
Police are also required to provide their badge numbers and name when asked
June 19, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Police are also required to provide their badge numbers and name when asked
It's not like she can provide anyone intelligence anyways...
June 19, 2025 at 2:15 AM
It's not like she can provide anyone intelligence anyways...
Me: I don't joke about it; I just don't care.
June 19, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Me: I don't joke about it; I just don't care.
It's incredibly sad that the America I fought for for most of my life is no longer considered as an ally by the nations I went to war as a partner with.
June 19, 2025 at 2:06 AM
It's incredibly sad that the America I fought for for most of my life is no longer considered as an ally by the nations I went to war as a partner with.
What the fuck makes you think any of these guys were required to pass a civil service test?
June 19, 2025 at 2:01 AM
What the fuck makes you think any of these guys were required to pass a civil service test?
Police officers working around the nation go without masks every fucking day. They're still doing their jobs. If ICE personnel weren't being shitty asshats, I bet you that they would be treated like they were shitty asshats!
Not too fucking tough. Act a thug, get treated a thug.
Not too fucking tough. Act a thug, get treated a thug.
June 19, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Police officers working around the nation go without masks every fucking day. They're still doing their jobs. If ICE personnel weren't being shitty asshats, I bet you that they would be treated like they were shitty asshats!
Not too fucking tough. Act a thug, get treated a thug.
Not too fucking tough. Act a thug, get treated a thug.
Shocking that LAW enforcement officers should be required to identify themselves and be responsible for upholding the peace instead of instigating chaos, fear, and distrust.
May as well be driving Barricade with his motto of "to punish and enslave."
May as well be driving Barricade with his motto of "to punish and enslave."
June 19, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Shocking that LAW enforcement officers should be required to identify themselves and be responsible for upholding the peace instead of instigating chaos, fear, and distrust.
May as well be driving Barricade with his motto of "to punish and enslave."
May as well be driving Barricade with his motto of "to punish and enslave."
What did anyone expect? Mike Lee is a waste of oxygen masquerading as a human being. He's a shit human with a shit following that 100% fails on every level of decency, let alone the high standards we all should have for our elected politicians.
June 19, 2025 at 1:55 AM
What did anyone expect? Mike Lee is a waste of oxygen masquerading as a human being. He's a shit human with a shit following that 100% fails on every level of decency, let alone the high standards we all should have for our elected politicians.
I've been there for years now, lol. I recommended new ones back then, I thought, but I haven't been back in a hot minute.
March 17, 2025 at 3:01 PM
I've been there for years now, lol. I recommended new ones back then, I thought, but I haven't been back in a hot minute.
These are great, but they're so narrow, older textures, and not enough deviations
March 17, 2025 at 1:34 PM
These are great, but they're so narrow, older textures, and not enough deviations
I was literally looking at the bald cypress assets we have and was desperately hoping there had been more added since the last time I looked (probably 8-20 months ago).
You're my hero!
You're my hero!
March 17, 2025 at 1:32 PM
I was literally looking at the bald cypress assets we have and was desperately hoping there had been more added since the last time I looked (probably 8-20 months ago).
You're my hero!
You're my hero!
As an initial reaction, I think that's fair. And in 1999, perhaps, even reasonable afterwards that people would be like "oh my god!"
But everyone has access to the internet these days. The collective knowledge of mankind is at their fingertips.
Just look some of them up.
But everyone has access to the internet these days. The collective knowledge of mankind is at their fingertips.
Just look some of them up.
March 17, 2025 at 1:13 PM
As an initial reaction, I think that's fair. And in 1999, perhaps, even reasonable afterwards that people would be like "oh my god!"
But everyone has access to the internet these days. The collective knowledge of mankind is at their fingertips.
Just look some of them up.
But everyone has access to the internet these days. The collective knowledge of mankind is at their fingertips.
Just look some of them up.
Is it, though? How many of those did they look up? It's not really a secret that pretty much any substance has a scientific name these days.
They're not at all curious?
Just scared?
Seems a silly way to live.
They're not at all curious?
Just scared?
Seems a silly way to live.
March 17, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Is it, though? How many of those did they look up? It's not really a secret that pretty much any substance has a scientific name these days.
They're not at all curious?
Just scared?
Seems a silly way to live.
They're not at all curious?
Just scared?
Seems a silly way to live.
Reposted
Formaldehyde is the same chemical whether your body makes it or it comes from a bottle.
There’s no such thing as “natural” and “synthetic” formaldehyde in how your body responds to it.
If the chemical name is formaldehyde, that’s what it is.
Read more ⬇️
news.immunologic.org/p/cyanide-is...
There’s no such thing as “natural” and “synthetic” formaldehyde in how your body responds to it.
If the chemical name is formaldehyde, that’s what it is.
Read more ⬇️
news.immunologic.org/p/cyanide-is...
Cyanide is natural, Aspirin is synthetic. Which one do you trust?
Natural doesn’t mean safe and synthetic doesn’t mean harmful—the appeal to nature fallacy convinces you otherwise.
news.immunologic.org
March 15, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Formaldehyde is the same chemical whether your body makes it or it comes from a bottle.
There’s no such thing as “natural” and “synthetic” formaldehyde in how your body responds to it.
If the chemical name is formaldehyde, that’s what it is.
Read more ⬇️
news.immunologic.org/p/cyanide-is...
There’s no such thing as “natural” and “synthetic” formaldehyde in how your body responds to it.
If the chemical name is formaldehyde, that’s what it is.
Read more ⬇️
news.immunologic.org/p/cyanide-is...
Bernie caucuses with the Democrats. He primaries with the Democrats.he knows he can't win without the Democrats.
The system is broken and it won't be fixed in a Presidential election. 3rd party's only chance is stealing seats in Congress and being wildly successful with legislation.
The system is broken and it won't be fixed in a Presidential election. 3rd party's only chance is stealing seats in Congress and being wildly successful with legislation.
March 13, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Bernie caucuses with the Democrats. He primaries with the Democrats.he knows he can't win without the Democrats.
The system is broken and it won't be fixed in a Presidential election. 3rd party's only chance is stealing seats in Congress and being wildly successful with legislation.
The system is broken and it won't be fixed in a Presidential election. 3rd party's only chance is stealing seats in Congress and being wildly successful with legislation.
I suppose the 3rd party of my post including the word "you" makes it feel targeted, but it it's not a specific you, rather a general "you." Perhaps "ppl" would have been a better choice.
If I had meant to be rude, I wouldn't be trying to explain it, I'd still be rude.
If I had meant to be rude, I wouldn't be trying to explain it, I'd still be rude.
March 13, 2025 at 12:46 PM
I suppose the 3rd party of my post including the word "you" makes it feel targeted, but it it's not a specific you, rather a general "you." Perhaps "ppl" would have been a better choice.
If I had meant to be rude, I wouldn't be trying to explain it, I'd still be rude.
If I had meant to be rude, I wouldn't be trying to explain it, I'd still be rude.
So stop leaving down my throat like I'm accusing you of so ething or trying to suppress your opinion. I'm not. But 3rd party doesn't get us out of this fucking shitty situation and you know it doesn't. It's just not viable.
March 13, 2025 at 12:37 PM
So stop leaving down my throat like I'm accusing you of so ething or trying to suppress your opinion. I'm not. But 3rd party doesn't get us out of this fucking shitty situation and you know it doesn't. It's just not viable.
I don't disagree you can have your opinion and I value it. 100%. But these days words are literally speaking things to life. Enough either didn't vote or voted 3rd that we ended with this disaster.
March 13, 2025 at 12:35 PM
I don't disagree you can have your opinion and I value it. 100%. But these days words are literally speaking things to life. Enough either didn't vote or voted 3rd that we ended with this disaster.
I didn't say a single thing about how you, yourself, voted. I stated that thinking 3rd party (or that a person would not vote for the only person who had a chance to beat Trump) is how we got Agent Orange.
Just like, if we have elections in 2028, I will vote Dem. Otherwise MAGA wins.
Just like, if we have elections in 2028, I will vote Dem. Otherwise MAGA wins.
March 13, 2025 at 12:34 PM
I didn't say a single thing about how you, yourself, voted. I stated that thinking 3rd party (or that a person would not vote for the only person who had a chance to beat Trump) is how we got Agent Orange.
Just like, if we have elections in 2028, I will vote Dem. Otherwise MAGA wins.
Just like, if we have elections in 2028, I will vote Dem. Otherwise MAGA wins.
No offense, but in this current climate you're never going to get enough ppl to endorse 3rd party. All you're going to do is take away votes from one candidate, typically the Dems.
That thinking is what got us Trump.
If you don't think Harris would've been exponentially better, that's the problem.
That thinking is what got us Trump.
If you don't think Harris would've been exponentially better, that's the problem.
March 13, 2025 at 12:21 PM
No offense, but in this current climate you're never going to get enough ppl to endorse 3rd party. All you're going to do is take away votes from one candidate, typically the Dems.
That thinking is what got us Trump.
If you don't think Harris would've been exponentially better, that's the problem.
That thinking is what got us Trump.
If you don't think Harris would've been exponentially better, that's the problem.
I wasn't aware he was terming out, thanks for that education! I still think he's probably going to primary for the 2028 POTUS cycle. Like Buttigieg, he's one of the few younger, dynamic candidates, engaging, & handles conservative critics/media really well and has a history of challenging MAGA.
March 13, 2025 at 12:17 PM
I wasn't aware he was terming out, thanks for that education! I still think he's probably going to primary for the 2028 POTUS cycle. Like Buttigieg, he's one of the few younger, dynamic candidates, engaging, & handles conservative critics/media really well and has a history of challenging MAGA.