dcrouch.bsky.social
@dcrouch.bsky.social
Great article. I love scientists
November 28, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Great article. I love scientists
This is easily remedied. I’m so tired about people with platforms moaning about the algorithm and the feed. Each social media tool has a manner of use that shows you just who you are following with the odd ad at most
November 28, 2025 at 3:29 PM
This is easily remedied. I’m so tired about people with platforms moaning about the algorithm and the feed. Each social media tool has a manner of use that shows you just who you are following with the odd ad at most
Or a calculator
October 28, 2025 at 5:09 AM
Or a calculator
Unfortunately asbestos is an activist driven bogeyman. It is dangerous when the wrong type is used or handled improperly without risk mitigation procedures. Corey would be better off with a better metaphor.
October 1, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Unfortunately asbestos is an activist driven bogeyman. It is dangerous when the wrong type is used or handled improperly without risk mitigation procedures. Corey would be better off with a better metaphor.
Brilliant article that adds the requisite third dimension to a normally two dimensional narrative
October 1, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Brilliant article that adds the requisite third dimension to a normally two dimensional narrative
But is this not a case perhaps of say one thing, do another
August 26, 2025 at 3:51 PM
But is this not a case perhaps of say one thing, do another
It was scary then. It is scary now. We still haven’t learned
August 26, 2025 at 3:44 PM
It was scary then. It is scary now. We still haven’t learned
Straight to ad hominem shows little knowledge of “reasoning”
July 22, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Straight to ad hominem shows little knowledge of “reasoning”
Better to call in the arithmetic mean
May 28, 2025 at 3:29 PM
Better to call in the arithmetic mean
But he works at Meta so he has to bow his head in shame over their corporate practices if he had any morals
May 5, 2025 at 4:05 PM
But he works at Meta so he has to bow his head in shame over their corporate practices if he had any morals
Indeed. But the key scientist involved sounds too agenda driven for my liking
April 28, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Indeed. But the key scientist involved sounds too agenda driven for my liking
Which they define VERY liberally. Such as invention of electricity Not sure “just” needs inclusion.
April 20, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Which they define VERY liberally. Such as invention of electricity Not sure “just” needs inclusion.
Including evidently Mr Mollick who is touting them hard today
March 20, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Including evidently Mr Mollick who is touting them hard today
I mostly agree but you seem to have missed out that most social platform scrolling is visual / aural not textual. This creates more passivity except the odd thumb flick up
March 14, 2025 at 11:00 PM
I mostly agree but you seem to have missed out that most social platform scrolling is visual / aural not textual. This creates more passivity except the odd thumb flick up
But meanwhile Cheerleader Mollick:
“smart outside observers of the AI industry who do not gain from hype, like Kevin Roose (below) & Ezra Klein
I think ignoring the possibility they are right is a mistake”
They don’t gain from hype. Hmmm
“smart outside observers of the AI industry who do not gain from hype, like Kevin Roose (below) & Ezra Klein
I think ignoring the possibility they are right is a mistake”
They don’t gain from hype. Hmmm
March 14, 2025 at 10:56 PM
But meanwhile Cheerleader Mollick:
“smart outside observers of the AI industry who do not gain from hype, like Kevin Roose (below) & Ezra Klein
I think ignoring the possibility they are right is a mistake”
They don’t gain from hype. Hmmm
“smart outside observers of the AI industry who do not gain from hype, like Kevin Roose (below) & Ezra Klein
I think ignoring the possibility they are right is a mistake”
They don’t gain from hype. Hmmm
Thanks for the takedown of Shaq, Charles, Ernie & Kenny. I have loved the NBA since 1968 & they are horrible. They talk over each other like the highly paid buffoons they are. Shaq is in the top 5 players ever to not reach his potential. He was never in great shape & his fundamentals were poor
March 12, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Thanks for the takedown of Shaq, Charles, Ernie & Kenny. I have loved the NBA since 1968 & they are horrible. They talk over each other like the highly paid buffoons they are. Shaq is in the top 5 players ever to not reach his potential. He was never in great shape & his fundamentals were poor
Same about entrepreneurs. We glorify the few high profile oddballs who have amazing success and nit the tens of thousands who are spectacularly unsuccessful and disappear without a trace
February 24, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Same about entrepreneurs. We glorify the few high profile oddballs who have amazing success and nit the tens of thousands who are spectacularly unsuccessful and disappear without a trace
Just like anyone can own and badly run a basketball team. All they need is $3+ billion dollars, a massive ego and a predilection for meddling in on court issues which you know nothing about
February 21, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Just like anyone can own and badly run a basketball team. All they need is $3+ billion dollars, a massive ego and a predilection for meddling in on court issues which you know nothing about
But in the meantime this pertinent observation of Mollick’s emphasizes the artificial part of the intelligence
February 3, 2025 at 9:16 PM
But in the meantime this pertinent observation of Mollick’s emphasizes the artificial part of the intelligence