@dbtacos88.bsky.social
recovering lawyer but I still believe in the rule of law
Competent lawyering makes it so much easier for the clerks…they spent half the opinion trying to decipher Pam’s nonsense.
November 24, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Competent lawyering makes it so much easier for the clerks…they spent half the opinion trying to decipher Pam’s nonsense.
I liked the cite to Alito as AAG in footnote 14, too
November 24, 2025 at 6:36 PM
I liked the cite to Alito as AAG in footnote 14, too
Do we get a ruling on the vindictive prosecution claim, or will it be mooted do we think? I’d like to see them lose twice…and then once more for the GJ dipshittery…
November 24, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Do we get a ruling on the vindictive prosecution claim, or will it be mooted do we think? I’d like to see them lose twice…and then once more for the GJ dipshittery…
So there’s no path to citizenship…I think if people knew how systemically broken our immigration system is, maybe they wouldnt go on and on about emigrating “the right way.” I’m a lawyer and immigration law terrifies me. That says a lot.
November 22, 2025 at 4:10 AM
So there’s no path to citizenship…I think if people knew how systemically broken our immigration system is, maybe they wouldnt go on and on about emigrating “the right way.” I’m a lawyer and immigration law terrifies me. That says a lot.
Now I feel ignorant not knowing TPS for somalis is expiring. You may not know this, but of 700 on tps do we know how many have citizenship or another basis for residence? (And thank you for the context!)
November 22, 2025 at 3:48 AM
Now I feel ignorant not knowing TPS for somalis is expiring. You may not know this, but of 700 on tps do we know how many have citizenship or another basis for residence? (And thank you for the context!)
I had predicted “MamDonnie” as the headline. 🙄
November 22, 2025 at 3:43 AM
I had predicted “MamDonnie” as the headline. 🙄
We needed this laugh so much, and what irony in the fact that it’s funny precisely because it’s meaningless beyond today. “If you stand for nothing, what will you fall for.”
November 22, 2025 at 3:37 AM
We needed this laugh so much, and what irony in the fact that it’s funny precisely because it’s meaningless beyond today. “If you stand for nothing, what will you fall for.”
Right?? I admit i could not stand her, but this reverse heel turn. ..
November 22, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Right?? I admit i could not stand her, but this reverse heel turn. ..
I was trying to guess the NY Post front page. Thats my guess. (Dad joke by a mom brain)
November 22, 2025 at 3:13 AM
I was trying to guess the NY Post front page. Thats my guess. (Dad joke by a mom brain)
We needed this for the jokes.
November 21, 2025 at 10:17 PM
We needed this for the jokes.
Maybe the judge who heard Comey’s and James’s vindictive prosecution claims will dismiss with prejudice and moot what was an incredibly dumb mistake (whether the MAC counter reject lawyer was clueless or thought she could pull a fast one)
November 20, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Maybe the judge who heard Comey’s and James’s vindictive prosecution claims will dismiss with prejudice and moot what was an incredibly dumb mistake (whether the MAC counter reject lawyer was clueless or thought she could pull a fast one)
How do they prove GJ only no billed the 1st charge though?
November 20, 2025 at 12:02 AM
How do they prove GJ only no billed the 1st charge though?
Technical q: Is there a threshold level of dipshittery that would justify dismissing with prejudice FOR NOT PRESENTING IT TO GJ because you arent even a parking garage lawyer?
November 20, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Technical q: Is there a threshold level of dipshittery that would justify dismissing with prejudice FOR NOT PRESENTING IT TO GJ because you arent even a parking garage lawyer?
Occam’s razor tells me it’s absolutely #1
November 19, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Occam’s razor tells me it’s absolutely #1
He seems to personally and intensely dislike his colleague, and that might be the understatement of the decade. Didnt make it to the end to see if Q anon and space lasers made an appearance
November 19, 2025 at 11:14 PM
He seems to personally and intensely dislike his colleague, and that might be the understatement of the decade. Didnt make it to the end to see if Q anon and space lasers made an appearance
Ok I stopped reading at the 30th “I dissent”—I am not super familiar with this district (thank god)—is this judge always this unprofessional? Attacking a colleague personally is unbecoming…this is unhinged narcissist loner lunacy
November 19, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Ok I stopped reading at the 30th “I dissent”—I am not super familiar with this district (thank god)—is this judge always this unprofessional? Attacking a colleague personally is unbecoming…this is unhinged narcissist loner lunacy
That was my go to sandwich! Now tiny, with terrible bacon and dry bread. Havent been there in a loooonng time.
November 19, 2025 at 6:11 PM
That was my go to sandwich! Now tiny, with terrible bacon and dry bread. Havent been there in a loooonng time.
I cant decide what’s worse: the writing or the subject.
November 14, 2025 at 7:41 PM
I cant decide what’s worse: the writing or the subject.
It’s like Cal Worthington and Saddam Hussein opened a kia dealership
November 6, 2025 at 11:47 PM
It’s like Cal Worthington and Saddam Hussein opened a kia dealership
In 2008 I said the gov would make money from TARP and omg the ridicule. But in this decade, nobody, including the govt, is making a dime bailing out an “industry” so far over its skis it will take over the power grid to produce slop.
November 6, 2025 at 4:46 AM
In 2008 I said the gov would make money from TARP and omg the ridicule. But in this decade, nobody, including the govt, is making a dime bailing out an “industry” so far over its skis it will take over the power grid to produce slop.
“Before” is one way to summarize that now quaint scandal 😂😂😂
November 5, 2025 at 2:02 AM
“Before” is one way to summarize that now quaint scandal 😂😂😂