DSZlaw
DSZlaw
@dazlaw.bsky.social
Renewable Energy Attorney
3. and they want to reprioritize the reasons for growth. For example, GDP is one measurement we use to determine whether a country is growing and the economy is good, but this often misses how regular people view the state of the economy.
June 2, 2025 at 8:26 PM
2. either you accept abundance and improve the quality of life or embrace degrowth and starve the world. But from my limited understanding of the degrowth movement, I do not think it is a fair framing of their position. From what I understand, they are against growth for growth's sake,
June 2, 2025 at 8:26 PM
6. So why would you include this information without contextualizing it? You can't simultaneously present yourself as well-versed in the subject and continue to tout disinformation about the industry.
June 2, 2025 at 7:19 PM
5. but when it comes time to actually build and use the land, a turbine will only take up a couple acres at most. So you will have a project lease possibly thousands of acres, but only actually use a tiny fraction of the actual land.
June 2, 2025 at 7:19 PM
4. In other words, though wind and solar (and especially wind) need a lot of land to start with, the ultimate footprint is far smaller. For example, when developing a wind project, the developer will initially lease an entire parcel or series of parcels,
June 2, 2025 at 7:19 PM
3. Not cited in "Abundance" is the very next sentence in the Princeton Report which reads: "Lands directly impacted by wind and solar farms (e.g. with roads, turbine pads, solar arrays, inverters, and substations) are only a fraction of the total site area: about 40,000 km2..."
June 2, 2025 at 7:19 PM
2. Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Tennessee." This is a common false accusation by opponents of wind and solar; i.e. wind and solar are impractical because they take up too much land! Look at all of those states!
June 2, 2025 at 7:19 PM
2. b. it strawmans the degrowth movement; c. it fails to adequately address any of the bottlenecks in the energy development process; and d. it prioritizes things like AI much more than things that democrats should be touting (i.e. reliability and affordability).
June 2, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Absolutely, I think if the Dems had shown any evidence that they will respond in a way that meets the moment recently, there would be less gnashing of teeth.
January 28, 2025 at 5:21 PM
One of the more indelible memories for me from Game 7 of that series is Lue bawling into a towel after they won. Guy gave it his all.
November 18, 2024 at 9:12 PM
Sports BlueSky! Quote Post with your favorite teams I'll start
NBA: Cavs
NFL: Browns (ducks)
NHL: Canes
College: Wake Forest (also GWU Women's volleyball
MLB: Guards
CFL: nope
Soccer: nope
PWHL: huh?
NLL: stop making stuff up
November 12, 2024 at 12:23 AM
Don't apologize. You gave us optimism that felt good for a bit. This isn't your fault.
November 6, 2024 at 11:17 AM
Can't wait to see how Michigan State's A/V team incorporates this into their video package.
October 11, 2024 at 3:25 PM