Both Ashland (9, X9) and Western (49, X49) slow down a lot near the hospital district/290. What bus priority treatments would work best here?
Both Ashland (9, X9) and Western (49, X49) slow down a lot near the hospital district/290. What bus priority treatments would work best here?
Express spacing works! And it works better when there's less traffic. On the other hand - our frequent stop spacing sucks, the non-express routes average like 9mph and even in like the middle of the night they're not going *that* much faster
Express spacing works! And it works better when there's less traffic. On the other hand - our frequent stop spacing sucks, the non-express routes average like 9mph and even in like the middle of the night they're not going *that* much faster
* Express stop spacing increases average speed 13% (9.6->10.8mph)
* This advantage is larger with less traffic (24% from 5-6am, 21% from 9-10am)
* No notable difference between 4, 49, 9 routes
* Express stop spacing increases average speed 13% (9.6->10.8mph)
* This advantage is larger with less traffic (24% from 5-6am, 21% from 9-10am)
* No notable difference between 4, 49, 9 routes
Maybe this was redundant but I made a script that is now logging CTA tracker data for express buses and their non-express equivalents. Goal is to see the effect of stop spacing. Any other ideas with this dataset?
Maybe this was redundant but I made a script that is now logging CTA tracker data for express buses and their non-express equivalents. Goal is to see the effect of stop spacing. Any other ideas with this dataset?