David Hartman
@dawiet.bsky.social
Reposted by David Hartman
Just published at CHI ’25: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs over- and under-moderate hate speech dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/... w/ @dawiet.bsky.social ky.social, Amin Oueslati @hheuer.bsky.social cial @dimitristaufer.bsky.social al Lena Pohlmann. 🧵
Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations | Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Co...
dl.acm.org
May 12, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Just published at CHI ’25: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs over- and under-moderate hate speech dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/... w/ @dawiet.bsky.social ky.social, Amin Oueslati @hheuer.bsky.social cial @dimitristaufer.bsky.social al Lena Pohlmann. 🧵
Reposted by David Hartman
About those echo chambers and filter bubbles...
Systematic review finds no clear cut evidence. It depends on the methods, too much research relies on the US, and specific platforms. And science needs better data to truly assess this, fx via the Digital Services Act
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Systematic review finds no clear cut evidence. It depends on the methods, too much research relies on the US, and specific platforms. And science needs better data to truly assess this, fx via the Digital Services Act
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes - Journal of Computational Social Science
This systematic review synthesizes research on echo chambers and filter bubbles to explore the reasons behind dissent regarding their existence, antecedents, and effects. It provides a taxonomy of con...
link.springer.com
April 8, 2025 at 6:26 AM
About those echo chambers and filter bubbles...
Systematic review finds no clear cut evidence. It depends on the methods, too much research relies on the US, and specific platforms. And science needs better data to truly assess this, fx via the Digital Services Act
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Systematic review finds no clear cut evidence. It depends on the methods, too much research relies on the US, and specific platforms. And science needs better data to truly assess this, fx via the Digital Services Act
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Reposted by David Hartman
1/4 Exciting News!
David Hartmann et al.'s paper, "Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations," has been accepted to CHI Conference 2025.
David Hartmann et al.'s paper, "Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations," has been accepted to CHI Conference 2025.
March 5, 2025 at 3:51 PM
1/4 Exciting News!
David Hartmann et al.'s paper, "Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations," has been accepted to CHI Conference 2025.
David Hartmann et al.'s paper, "Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations," has been accepted to CHI Conference 2025.
Reposted by David Hartman
4/4 This work has been a joined Project between the @weizenbauminstitut.bsky.social, @cais-research.bsky.social and @hertieschool.bsky.social with the co-authors @dawiet.bsky.social, Amin Oueslati, Dimitri Staufer @dimitristaufer.bsky.social, Lena Pohlmann, Simon Munzert, Hendrik Heuer.
March 5, 2025 at 3:54 PM
4/4 This work has been a joined Project between the @weizenbauminstitut.bsky.social, @cais-research.bsky.social and @hertieschool.bsky.social with the co-authors @dawiet.bsky.social, Amin Oueslati, Dimitri Staufer @dimitristaufer.bsky.social, Lena Pohlmann, Simon Munzert, Hendrik Heuer.