David Sanson
banner
davsans.bsky.social
David Sanson
@davsans.bsky.social
Philosopher working in metaphysics, philosophy of language, and the history of philosophy in the Islamic world.
I tried reading it in grad school (with an eye to figuring out whether or not to give it to teen relatives) and hated it. But maybe I was not yet old enough to enjoy reading young again at that point!
December 6, 2024 at 9:27 PM
Good point!
December 6, 2024 at 8:50 PM
December 6, 2024 at 8:27 PM
Also on the list, Matt Strohl's *Why it is OK to Love Bad Movies*. #philosophybookgiftlist
December 6, 2024 at 8:22 PM
Also on the list, Cowling and Cray's *Philosophy of Comics*.
December 6, 2024 at 8:19 PM
Also on the list: @carriejenkins.bsky.social's *What Love is--and What it Could Be?*
December 6, 2024 at 8:18 PM
Also on the list Conee and Sider's *Riddles of Existence*.
December 6, 2024 at 8:17 PM
Also on the list: Carol Hay's *Think like a Feminist*.
December 6, 2024 at 8:16 PM
Also on the list: @nickriggle.bsky.social's *On Being Awesome* and *This Beauty*.
December 6, 2024 at 8:15 PM
A few years ago, I gave my then 14 year old nephew @aaronjames.bsky.social's *Assholes: A Theory*. So that is already on my list.
December 6, 2024 at 8:13 PM
Presumably they took themselves to be gods as well!
November 26, 2024 at 3:02 AM
And, more generally, is there more to this history of treating this passage as an instance of the Liar? Anything that might help connect it to al-Baghdadi, who, several centuries later, uses the Liar as a counterexample to the Manichaean position on agency?
November 25, 2024 at 5:14 PM
My question: Is this view of agency something folks like Origen and Jerome develop elsewhere, or is this just a one-off interpretative move applied to this passage?
November 25, 2024 at 5:10 PM
That is more or less exactly the view attributed to the Manichaeans by their early Islamic critics, like al-Nazzam: every created agent is either of the light, and so always tells the truth, or of the dark, and so always lies. #manichaeism
November 25, 2024 at 5:07 PM
Origen and Jerome argue that, if David were a man, then, by saying this, he would have said something both true and false. To avoid this, they claim that David, being holy, is a god and not a man. They then assert that what David said is true: gods always tell the truth, and men always lie.
November 25, 2024 at 5:04 PM
Reposted by David Sanson
The Special Issue on The Futures of Trans Philosophy is excellent, open access, and features new work by Ray Briggs, Capucine Mercier, Sanjula Rajat, Billie Waller, and Perry Zurn! Many thanks to Imogen M. Sullivan and Rowan Bell for editing. cdn.ymaws.com/www.apaonlin...
cdn.ymaws.com
November 19, 2024 at 2:46 PM
I made it! Now I can see all of your Canadian news links!
December 22, 2023 at 10:13 PM