Davouts
@davouts.bsky.social
No, the USA targets MANY wrong groups, some get leaked, even fewer gains traction in western media, even fewer get to any court, even fewer are found guilty.
War is always horrific, no excuses.
Russia is no paragon of virtue, Russia should not be in Ukraine, but I understand Russian concerns.
War is always horrific, no excuses.
Russia is no paragon of virtue, Russia should not be in Ukraine, but I understand Russian concerns.
May 15, 2025 at 11:12 AM
No, the USA targets MANY wrong groups, some get leaked, even fewer gains traction in western media, even fewer get to any court, even fewer are found guilty.
War is always horrific, no excuses.
Russia is no paragon of virtue, Russia should not be in Ukraine, but I understand Russian concerns.
War is always horrific, no excuses.
Russia is no paragon of virtue, Russia should not be in Ukraine, but I understand Russian concerns.
As I said your comprehension is poor. Maybe English is not your first language....
I can not "read" the interpretation you applied to it. That is for you to supply.
Why will YOU not just state who YOU were referencing when YOU said "they"?
I can not "read" the interpretation you applied to it. That is for you to supply.
Why will YOU not just state who YOU were referencing when YOU said "they"?
May 15, 2025 at 9:17 AM
As I said your comprehension is poor. Maybe English is not your first language....
I can not "read" the interpretation you applied to it. That is for you to supply.
Why will YOU not just state who YOU were referencing when YOU said "they"?
I can not "read" the interpretation you applied to it. That is for you to supply.
Why will YOU not just state who YOU were referencing when YOU said "they"?
You originally said, I said Russia was planning to attack itself.
You now admit that I broadly said the proposed Russian base 160miles from Finish border is for defence.
I also said the base is proposed in response to the increased NATO threat from Finland joining NATO and NATO wargames.
Facts
You now admit that I broadly said the proposed Russian base 160miles from Finish border is for defence.
I also said the base is proposed in response to the increased NATO threat from Finland joining NATO and NATO wargames.
Facts
May 15, 2025 at 9:12 AM
You originally said, I said Russia was planning to attack itself.
You now admit that I broadly said the proposed Russian base 160miles from Finish border is for defence.
I also said the base is proposed in response to the increased NATO threat from Finland joining NATO and NATO wargames.
Facts
You now admit that I broadly said the proposed Russian base 160miles from Finish border is for defence.
I also said the base is proposed in response to the increased NATO threat from Finland joining NATO and NATO wargames.
Facts
I am asking you for your opinion, as you seriously have issues eith comprehension.
Again, who are they, that YOU refer to.
Again, who are they, that YOU refer to.
May 14, 2025 at 4:09 PM
I am asking you for your opinion, as you seriously have issues eith comprehension.
Again, who are they, that YOU refer to.
Again, who are they, that YOU refer to.
It is amazing that when someone clearly says the Russian base is not to attack Finland, you think that person is a Putin lover.
Strangely enough, you later agree with my original post.....lol
Strangely enough, you later agree with my original post.....lol
May 14, 2025 at 4:07 PM
It is amazing that when someone clearly says the Russian base is not to attack Finland, you think that person is a Putin lover.
Strangely enough, you later agree with my original post.....lol
Strangely enough, you later agree with my original post.....lol
You mean like blowing up wedding parties? Or destroying civilian infrastructure to stop the enemy from gaining from them?
Your buddies use it to very "good" effect.
The issue is war and your buddies make a killing on th e backs of it.
Your buddies use it to very "good" effect.
The issue is war and your buddies make a killing on th e backs of it.
May 14, 2025 at 4:02 PM
You mean like blowing up wedding parties? Or destroying civilian infrastructure to stop the enemy from gaining from them?
Your buddies use it to very "good" effect.
The issue is war and your buddies make a killing on th e backs of it.
Your buddies use it to very "good" effect.
The issue is war and your buddies make a killing on th e backs of it.
There is more evidence of WMDs in Iraq than there is of thd attrocities Russia is claimed to have done.
USA definitely used phosphorus, cluster bombs, uranium tipped shells, napalm and chemical weapons. They also used sex as a weapon of war, torture and other attrocities.
The issue is war.
USA definitely used phosphorus, cluster bombs, uranium tipped shells, napalm and chemical weapons. They also used sex as a weapon of war, torture and other attrocities.
The issue is war.
May 14, 2025 at 3:59 PM
There is more evidence of WMDs in Iraq than there is of thd attrocities Russia is claimed to have done.
USA definitely used phosphorus, cluster bombs, uranium tipped shells, napalm and chemical weapons. They also used sex as a weapon of war, torture and other attrocities.
The issue is war.
USA definitely used phosphorus, cluster bombs, uranium tipped shells, napalm and chemical weapons. They also used sex as a weapon of war, torture and other attrocities.
The issue is war.
Lol.
Tell us. Which country was the first to drop a nuclear bomb, and which was the second.
Tell us. How many countries have the USA dropoed bombs on in the last 80 years and how many countries has the USA dropped bombs in?
Then tell us, if the USA has a first strike policy.
Tell us. Which country was the first to drop a nuclear bomb, and which was the second.
Tell us. How many countries have the USA dropoed bombs on in the last 80 years and how many countries has the USA dropped bombs in?
Then tell us, if the USA has a first strike policy.
May 14, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Lol.
Tell us. Which country was the first to drop a nuclear bomb, and which was the second.
Tell us. How many countries have the USA dropoed bombs on in the last 80 years and how many countries has the USA dropped bombs in?
Then tell us, if the USA has a first strike policy.
Tell us. Which country was the first to drop a nuclear bomb, and which was the second.
Tell us. How many countries have the USA dropoed bombs on in the last 80 years and how many countries has the USA dropped bombs in?
Then tell us, if the USA has a first strike policy.
LOL.
Exactly who are "they".
USA funds many NGOs around thd world. Until the NGO goes against their political aims then defunds them.
Exactly who are "they".
USA funds many NGOs around thd world. Until the NGO goes against their political aims then defunds them.
May 14, 2025 at 3:45 PM
LOL.
Exactly who are "they".
USA funds many NGOs around thd world. Until the NGO goes against their political aims then defunds them.
Exactly who are "they".
USA funds many NGOs around thd world. Until the NGO goes against their political aims then defunds them.
The extra base they are supposed to be building....... which would be further away.
But as you know full well. NATO has now deployed a base in Finland and do Russia responds likewise.
But as you know full well. NATO has now deployed a base in Finland and do Russia responds likewise.
May 14, 2025 at 3:41 PM
The extra base they are supposed to be building....... which would be further away.
But as you know full well. NATO has now deployed a base in Finland and do Russia responds likewise.
But as you know full well. NATO has now deployed a base in Finland and do Russia responds likewise.
Rdgarding military actions, the USA has and is doing far worse than any other country, with the possible exception of Israel, which gets away with genocide because it's an ally of the USA.
Go figure.
Go figure.
May 14, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Rdgarding military actions, the USA has and is doing far worse than any other country, with the possible exception of Israel, which gets away with genocide because it's an ally of the USA.
Go figure.
Go figure.
Wow.
I have no doubt that attrocities by military personnel occurs on all sides. There is nothing to suggest they happen any more by Russians than any other nation.
Including your beloved NATO angels.
Truth is the first thing lost in conflict and excessive patriotism is the main reason for that.
I have no doubt that attrocities by military personnel occurs on all sides. There is nothing to suggest they happen any more by Russians than any other nation.
Including your beloved NATO angels.
Truth is the first thing lost in conflict and excessive patriotism is the main reason for that.
May 14, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Wow.
I have no doubt that attrocities by military personnel occurs on all sides. There is nothing to suggest they happen any more by Russians than any other nation.
Including your beloved NATO angels.
Truth is the first thing lost in conflict and excessive patriotism is the main reason for that.
I have no doubt that attrocities by military personnel occurs on all sides. There is nothing to suggest they happen any more by Russians than any other nation.
Including your beloved NATO angels.
Truth is the first thing lost in conflict and excessive patriotism is the main reason for that.
NATO members have attacked many countries. First.
You yourself stated NATO countries have not been attacked, yet you know full well many NATO members have attacked other countries.
You yourself stated NATO countries have not been attacked, yet you know full well many NATO members have attacked other countries.
May 14, 2025 at 3:19 PM
NATO members have attacked many countries. First.
You yourself stated NATO countries have not been attacked, yet you know full well many NATO members have attacked other countries.
You yourself stated NATO countries have not been attacked, yet you know full well many NATO members have attacked other countries.
NATO members (USA hawkish allies) have no issues attacking other nations, without fear of retaliation, that they consider weak.
You cannot deny that with a straight face.
You cannot deny that with a straight face.
May 14, 2025 at 3:16 PM
NATO members (USA hawkish allies) have no issues attacking other nations, without fear of retaliation, that they consider weak.
You cannot deny that with a straight face.
You cannot deny that with a straight face.
So you agree.
Russia is not building a base 160 miles ftom the border to attack Finland. Which is exactly the point I first raised.
Russia did not see a need for a base in the NW, because NATO didn't have a base in Finland. Now it does snd now Russia sees a need for a base.
Comprehend.
Russia is not building a base 160 miles ftom the border to attack Finland. Which is exactly the point I first raised.
Russia did not see a need for a base in the NW, because NATO didn't have a base in Finland. Now it does snd now Russia sees a need for a base.
Comprehend.
May 14, 2025 at 3:12 PM
So you agree.
Russia is not building a base 160 miles ftom the border to attack Finland. Which is exactly the point I first raised.
Russia did not see a need for a base in the NW, because NATO didn't have a base in Finland. Now it does snd now Russia sees a need for a base.
Comprehend.
Russia is not building a base 160 miles ftom the border to attack Finland. Which is exactly the point I first raised.
Russia did not see a need for a base in the NW, because NATO didn't have a base in Finland. Now it does snd now Russia sees a need for a base.
Comprehend.
Again, you show your obnoxious bigotry and complete lack of comprehension from the outset.
As I said from the beginning, Russia is not building up forces in the NW to invade Finland.
Your sycophancy will not let you see the harm USA does around the world or that it causes more harm than anyone
As I said from the beginning, Russia is not building up forces in the NW to invade Finland.
Your sycophancy will not let you see the harm USA does around the world or that it causes more harm than anyone
May 14, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Again, you show your obnoxious bigotry and complete lack of comprehension from the outset.
As I said from the beginning, Russia is not building up forces in the NW to invade Finland.
Your sycophancy will not let you see the harm USA does around the world or that it causes more harm than anyone
As I said from the beginning, Russia is not building up forces in the NW to invade Finland.
Your sycophancy will not let you see the harm USA does around the world or that it causes more harm than anyone
Russiadoes the same.
The difference is the USA does it all over the world, whereas Russia is much more limited.
Both are bad, but you areblind to NATO hawkishness.
The difference is the USA does it all over the world, whereas Russia is much more limited.
Both are bad, but you areblind to NATO hawkishness.
May 14, 2025 at 5:25 AM
Russiadoes the same.
The difference is the USA does it all over the world, whereas Russia is much more limited.
Both are bad, but you areblind to NATO hawkishness.
The difference is the USA does it all over the world, whereas Russia is much more limited.
Both are bad, but you areblind to NATO hawkishness.
Lol,
You bet wrong, again.
Turkey from 2015 was "terrorist suppression". Not peacekeeping. You see I take time to look past the first comment.
USA/NATO hawk countries politically pick a side then use military force to achieve their aim. Calling on other NATO members/resources to help.
You bet wrong, again.
Turkey from 2015 was "terrorist suppression". Not peacekeeping. You see I take time to look past the first comment.
USA/NATO hawk countries politically pick a side then use military force to achieve their aim. Calling on other NATO members/resources to help.
May 14, 2025 at 5:22 AM
Lol,
You bet wrong, again.
Turkey from 2015 was "terrorist suppression". Not peacekeeping. You see I take time to look past the first comment.
USA/NATO hawk countries politically pick a side then use military force to achieve their aim. Calling on other NATO members/resources to help.
You bet wrong, again.
Turkey from 2015 was "terrorist suppression". Not peacekeeping. You see I take time to look past the first comment.
USA/NATO hawk countries politically pick a side then use military force to achieve their aim. Calling on other NATO members/resources to help.
Lol,
You listed Russia attacking operatives within a Russian federation state.
By YOUR analogy USA attacked operatives within another NATO state.
I am merely using your own rules against you.
You listed Russia attacking operatives within a Russian federation state.
By YOUR analogy USA attacked operatives within another NATO state.
I am merely using your own rules against you.
May 13, 2025 at 9:37 AM
Lol,
You listed Russia attacking operatives within a Russian federation state.
By YOUR analogy USA attacked operatives within another NATO state.
I am merely using your own rules against you.
You listed Russia attacking operatives within a Russian federation state.
By YOUR analogy USA attacked operatives within another NATO state.
I am merely using your own rules against you.
You really do have an issue with comprehension.
USA has targeted operatives within the countries listed, with or without the agreement of the official government.
The same way Russia targeted operatives within Syria and within Russian territory.
Britain targeted operatives in Ireland
USA has targeted operatives within the countries listed, with or without the agreement of the official government.
The same way Russia targeted operatives within Syria and within Russian territory.
Britain targeted operatives in Ireland
May 13, 2025 at 9:27 AM
You really do have an issue with comprehension.
USA has targeted operatives within the countries listed, with or without the agreement of the official government.
The same way Russia targeted operatives within Syria and within Russian territory.
Britain targeted operatives in Ireland
USA has targeted operatives within the countries listed, with or without the agreement of the official government.
The same way Russia targeted operatives within Syria and within Russian territory.
Britain targeted operatives in Ireland
Lol,
I see spart from being an obnoxious bigot you do massive hypocrisy as well.
All of the above are (US) operations against military targets in the countries listed.
Yes,Turkey.
Yes Egypt.
And the rest.
I see spart from being an obnoxious bigot you do massive hypocrisy as well.
All of the above are (US) operations against military targets in the countries listed.
Yes,Turkey.
Yes Egypt.
And the rest.
May 12, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Lol,
I see spart from being an obnoxious bigot you do massive hypocrisy as well.
All of the above are (US) operations against military targets in the countries listed.
Yes,Turkey.
Yes Egypt.
And the rest.
I see spart from being an obnoxious bigot you do massive hypocrisy as well.
All of the above are (US) operations against military targets in the countries listed.
Yes,Turkey.
Yes Egypt.
And the rest.
NATO nations attacking other countries since 1997
Yougoslavia, Iraq, Congo, Afghanistan, Haiti, Timor, Ethiopea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Pakistan, Turkey, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Nigeria, and an awful lot more.
Yougoslavia, Iraq, Congo, Afghanistan, Haiti, Timor, Ethiopea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Pakistan, Turkey, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Nigeria, and an awful lot more.
May 12, 2025 at 11:26 AM
NATO nations attacking other countries since 1997
Yougoslavia, Iraq, Congo, Afghanistan, Haiti, Timor, Ethiopea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Pakistan, Turkey, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Nigeria, and an awful lot more.
Yougoslavia, Iraq, Congo, Afghanistan, Haiti, Timor, Ethiopea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Pakistan, Turkey, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Nigeria, and an awful lot more.
Chechnya was part of Soviet Union and has been part of the Russian federation since.
Russia ceded Crimea and territory SE of Ukraine in 1958 as part of "eternal" friendship. This included the extremely important Crimean naval base.
The western backed coup was not eternal friendship.
Russia ceded Crimea and territory SE of Ukraine in 1958 as part of "eternal" friendship. This included the extremely important Crimean naval base.
The western backed coup was not eternal friendship.
May 10, 2025 at 8:45 AM
Chechnya was part of Soviet Union and has been part of the Russian federation since.
Russia ceded Crimea and territory SE of Ukraine in 1958 as part of "eternal" friendship. This included the extremely important Crimean naval base.
The western backed coup was not eternal friendship.
Russia ceded Crimea and territory SE of Ukraine in 1958 as part of "eternal" friendship. This included the extremely important Crimean naval base.
The western backed coup was not eternal friendship.
