David
@davidwcann.bsky.social
That IPA has a great name!
December 8, 2025 at 10:33 PM
That IPA has a great name!
Have fun, Josh. Wish I could catch the Boston show.
December 1, 2025 at 11:25 PM
Have fun, Josh. Wish I could catch the Boston show.
Also one of Dan Senor’s big hobbyhorses recently.
November 9, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Also one of Dan Senor’s big hobbyhorses recently.
How kind of her to drop a scoop in your lap like that.
October 21, 2025 at 12:12 AM
How kind of her to drop a scoop in your lap like that.
Okay, I’ll leave with a serious question. Why not use all who want to be foster parents as best as they can be used? A family could plausibly be in the foster program for years without a lgbt foster child. And, as the families note, the state can use its discretion in placement. Have a great night
September 29, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Okay, I’ll leave with a serious question. Why not use all who want to be foster parents as best as they can be used? A family could plausibly be in the foster program for years without a lgbt foster child. And, as the families note, the state can use its discretion in placement. Have a great night
At least it’s apparently okay for you to be bigoted and intolerant with respect to religious families.
September 29, 2025 at 10:25 PM
At least it’s apparently okay for you to be bigoted and intolerant with respect to religious families.
Good question! Rejecting loving families already successfully fostering is both intolerant and an injustice.
If Massachusetts had a surplus of foster parents already, perhaps it could be somewhat justified. I doubt that is the case, though.
If Massachusetts had a surplus of foster parents already, perhaps it could be somewhat justified. I doubt that is the case, though.
September 29, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Good question! Rejecting loving families already successfully fostering is both intolerant and an injustice.
If Massachusetts had a surplus of foster parents already, perhaps it could be somewhat justified. I doubt that is the case, though.
If Massachusetts had a surplus of foster parents already, perhaps it could be somewhat justified. I doubt that is the case, though.
They are not “would be” foster parents, they are multi-year experienced, committed foster parents whom the state is willing to discard for ideological reasons even with an extreme shortage of foster homes.
September 29, 2025 at 12:59 PM
They are not “would be” foster parents, they are multi-year experienced, committed foster parents whom the state is willing to discard for ideological reasons even with an extreme shortage of foster homes.
Does that mean we’re going to get rid of our standing army like we did during peacetime when we last had a Department of War?
September 5, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Does that mean we’re going to get rid of our standing army like we did during peacetime when we last had a Department of War?
Except the military has supported law enforcement at sea for over forty years. In 1983 I was on a navy ship that executed coast guard counter drug operations and intercepted and took over a ship carrying a bunch of drugs, arresting the crew. Disabling fire approved for use.
September 4, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Except the military has supported law enforcement at sea for over forty years. In 1983 I was on a navy ship that executed coast guard counter drug operations and intercepted and took over a ship carrying a bunch of drugs, arresting the crew. Disabling fire approved for use.
Congratulations!
My cat is certain that “Callie” is all about her…
My cat is certain that “Callie” is all about her…
September 4, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Congratulations!
My cat is certain that “Callie” is all about her…
My cat is certain that “Callie” is all about her…
Even if the not-going-to-happen constitutional amendment was successfully ratified, I think the best you’d get is the term limit clock starting at that point. You’re not going to boot Thomas and Roberts off the court in the first year.
August 10, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Even if the not-going-to-happen constitutional amendment was successfully ratified, I think the best you’d get is the term limit clock starting at that point. You’re not going to boot Thomas and Roberts off the court in the first year.
He didn’t really say anything.
August 2, 2025 at 1:53 AM
He didn’t really say anything.
I can’t read the post you replied to, because of the ridiculous blocking here. Sorry if I missed your point.
July 31, 2025 at 1:57 AM
I can’t read the post you replied to, because of the ridiculous blocking here. Sorry if I missed your point.
No force involved. Unforced error.
July 31, 2025 at 1:48 AM
No force involved. Unforced error.
I just think that after over half a year she should be leading *something* or discussing plans for something, if she intends to make the case she’s a leader
July 30, 2025 at 9:35 PM
I just think that after over half a year she should be leading *something* or discussing plans for something, if she intends to make the case she’s a leader
Well, his Pacific fleet submarines, anyway.
July 30, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Well, his Pacific fleet submarines, anyway.
We need Ajit Pai in a superhero costume to barge into the FCC, break shit up, and fix the place!
July 25, 2025 at 2:17 PM
We need Ajit Pai in a superhero costume to barge into the FCC, break shit up, and fix the place!
I dunno; the job she’s being moved to is certainly more impactful to today’s navy. She’ll be in the room, at the table ,for all policy and and budgetary decisions for the navy. USNA is mainly ceremonial.
July 18, 2025 at 2:09 PM
I dunno; the job she’s being moved to is certainly more impactful to today’s navy. She’ll be in the room, at the table ,for all policy and and budgetary decisions for the navy. USNA is mainly ceremonial.
I rode ships a few times as a Navy civilian, a few times in staterooms but also in 60 man berthing on Blue Ridge in 2009, and a godawful berthing space onboard Kitty Hawk in 2006.
July 15, 2025 at 6:21 PM
I rode ships a few times as a Navy civilian, a few times in staterooms but also in 60 man berthing on Blue Ridge in 2009, and a godawful berthing space onboard Kitty Hawk in 2006.
When you spend 40+ years saying “death to Israel”, surround Israel with terrorists and arm them to the teeth (see: hezbollah a year ago), and attack with hundreds of drones and missiles as Iran did, I’d say they assumption that innocence should be over.
June 17, 2025 at 1:34 AM
When you spend 40+ years saying “death to Israel”, surround Israel with terrorists and arm them to the teeth (see: hezbollah a year ago), and attack with hundreds of drones and missiles as Iran did, I’d say they assumption that innocence should be over.
I mean, Iran *could* just acknowledge Israel’s right to exist, and cease funding proxies created to terrorize the Jewish state. Further, they could stop arresting and killing Iranian women for showing their hair, and provide rights to all its citizens, as Israel does. Just a thought.
June 17, 2025 at 1:15 AM
I mean, Iran *could* just acknowledge Israel’s right to exist, and cease funding proxies created to terrorize the Jewish state. Further, they could stop arresting and killing Iranian women for showing their hair, and provide rights to all its citizens, as Israel does. Just a thought.
Even with all those crazies blocking you (and it’s 91,000 for me), the users on this site are still wacky!
June 7, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Even with all those crazies blocking you (and it’s 91,000 for me), the users on this site are still wacky!