David J. Gillcrist
banner
davidjgillcrist.com
David J. Gillcrist
@davidjgillcrist.com
Mathematician • PhD Candidate • Science Educator • Unabashedly Confused Person • Dad

Website: davidjgillcrist.com

I research differential geometry-informed optimal experimental design

Banner: Rings of dry ice vapor trapped by acoustic radiation force
Moral of the story: if you catch someone saying "Trump has a 'majority' mandate," you can just tell them this. Okay. I promise I'm done now 😁
September 23, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Also, to correct/specifiy my own math. If the tally error rate is applied only to the remaining, non-Trump votes you get ≈49.801%, but if you apply the rate to all the votes cast but miraculously say none of those are in Trump's votes you get ≈49.806%. Regardless, the point's still the same 😅
September 23, 2025 at 8:06 PM
more than 50% of votes cast. A majority voted for someone else. Perhaps this individual was missing sufficient information on how to interpret properly what winning the majority of the electoral college votes means. But, either way, a "majority" mandate, Trump has not. (4/4)
September 23, 2025 at 8:00 PM
the stops for Trump, he still lands with merely a plurality of votes. A large plurality albeit, but only a plurality nonetheless. He may have done better in this election than either of the previous two he ran in, but that doesn't make him something he's not, that being a candidate who won (3/4)
September 23, 2025 at 8:00 PM
i.e. 1 out of every 10,000 votes counted is inaccurate, and say all those inaccuracies are in Trump's favor, that raises his total count to 77,310,374, putting his percentage at ≈49.801%. Assuming we're defining "majority" reasonably as winning 50%+1 of votes cast, even when pulling out all (2/4)
September 23, 2025 at 8:00 PM
It's also funny because, according to the FEC's Official 2024 Presidential General Election Results, the total number of votes cast was 155,238,302; 77,302,580 of which were for Trump. Meaning he received ≈49.796% of the popular vote. Even if we use an exceptionally large tally error of 0.01%, (1/4)
www.fec.gov
September 23, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Hmmm 🤔, do mathematicians count?
September 8, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me"
– Martin Niemöller, Lutheran Pastor, Holocaust Survivor
(5/5)
April 28, 2025 at 4:32 PM
with it.

"First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist

(4/5)
April 28, 2025 at 4:32 PM
faced the utmost scrutiny of the people that elected them. Call your local, state, and federal representatives and put all the pressure you can muster on them to stand against the zealous grab of power we're witnessing . People that do not live with virtue should never be expected to govern… (3/5)
April 28, 2025 at 4:32 PM
baselessly as the outcome of a mother's choice who was swiftly and forcefully ejected out of this nation is one of the sorriest excuses for a deplorable act of this regime. Governments, regardless of the parties that steer them, are never owed the benefit of the doubt, and should ALWAYS be… (2/5)
April 28, 2025 at 4:32 PM