David Isaacson
@davidisaacson.bsky.social
I think it's because of this language in Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution: "Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days". They don't want to have to ask for the Senate's consent.
January 26, 2025 at 1:47 AM
I think it's because of this language in Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution: "Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days". They don't want to have to ask for the Senate's consent.
As I read the bill, it would also apply to applicants for adjustment of status who travel on advance parole and thus become inadmissible under 212(a)(7), as well as some people granted asylum. I blogged about this last year when the bill passed the House: blog.cyrusmehta.com/2024/04/lock... .
Lock Up Falsely Arrested Adjustment Applicants and Teenage Shoplifters, or Be Sued: the House’s “Laken Riley Act” | The Insightful Immigration Blog
On March 7, 2024, the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives passed the “Laken Riley Act”, H.R. 7511. The bill was named after a murder victim from Georgia, whose “alleged murderer”, as the bill...
blog.cyrusmehta.com
January 7, 2025 at 3:45 PM
As I read the bill, it would also apply to applicants for adjustment of status who travel on advance parole and thus become inadmissible under 212(a)(7), as well as some people granted asylum. I blogged about this last year when the bill passed the House: blog.cyrusmehta.com/2024/04/lock... .