David A. Weinberg
@davidaweinberg.bsky.social
Policy Strategist for @protectdemocracy.org
Punster, parent, patriot.
Former staffer for @January6thCmte, et al.
All views are my own, and retweets mean nothing.
Punster, parent, patriot.
Former staffer for @January6thCmte, et al.
All views are my own, and retweets mean nothing.
Reposted by David A. Weinberg
Just going to be an incredible decision if SCOTUS says they needed to make an emergency intervention because of the risk that poor people might get food they are legally entitled to
November 8, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Just going to be an incredible decision if SCOTUS says they needed to make an emergency intervention because of the risk that poor people might get food they are legally entitled to
Reposted by David A. Weinberg
Judge Ellis’s ruling is a necessary response to the Trump admin’s repeated violations of her previous temporary restraining order. To be clear: the admin's tactics in the Chicago area are from the authoritarian playbook—a deliberate, nationwide campaign to suppress dissent and neutralize opposition.
November 6, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Judge Ellis’s ruling is a necessary response to the Trump admin’s repeated violations of her previous temporary restraining order. To be clear: the admin's tactics in the Chicago area are from the authoritarian playbook—a deliberate, nationwide campaign to suppress dissent and neutralize opposition.