Happy New Year to you too!

Just to echo what at least a couple of callers to last night's programme said; my wife and I eagerly await each week's episode of American Week.

We hope that you can continue to fully ply your trade through these 'interesting' times...

'In a world where sustained proximity to mobile devices is now the norm, dismissing the potential localized biological impact of EMFs on oral tissues is no longer scientifically defensible.'

If anyone wants to pop along to ICNIRP to discuss anything, there are handy directions here...

www.icnirp.org/en/contact/

@microwavenews.com

I am deeply sceptical about this claim, but would be interested to know if any presentations from this event, written in English, are available? I am always interested to read opinions that differ wildly from my own lived experience of electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

Certainly an 'excellent' illustration of how NOT to conduct a study on CBT efficacy for EHS/MCS individuals, in my opinion...

@microwavenews.com

I've been trying - and failing so far - to find the composition of the ANSES Working Group on Radiofrequencies and cancer.

It's all very well for the ANSES report to provide a link to retrieve the experts' declarations of interest, but without knowing the names of these people...

Well, good luck with this one.

By the way, in the absence of clear diagnostic criteria for these conditions, how will the study's authors know that they have recruited genuinely EHS/MCS individuals?

I see.

Is this study, part-funded by INERIS, also of 'better quality'? If so, it looks like we may have a problem.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...