Apart from the first 2, these are grants tied to specific neurodegenerative diseases (so I don’t know whether that would imply skewing your research to be eligible).
PS: «subtypes This» in your article lacks a period.

alleninstitute.org/division/frontiers-group/distinguished-investigators/
americanbrainfoundation.org (grants@ to propose)
www.alzdiscovery.org/research-and...
www.michaeljfox.org/grant/parkin...
www.alz.org/research/for...
Experiment.com (crowdfunding, better than nothing)

Regarding future funding uncertainties, has your lab looked into private funding (e.g. Gates foundation)? I would certainly donate if I could, your research is both crucial and very qualitative (from what I can tell).

Just remembered this one:

"We introduce a modern Hopfield network with continuous states and a corresponding update rule. (...)

The new update rule is equivalent to the attention mechanism used in transformers. "

arxiv.org/abs/2008.02217

The intersection of Nature’s reader with people that would side with him is probably a tiny ensemble, but I’m still glad they took the stance.

Bonjour, il semble manquer un lien?

The embodiment of "The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole'"

I should have written "some of it", a lot of things went over my head reading it. Figured out you would have a better grasp on it anyway.