Dar
@darnitanywho.bsky.social
Still masking.
ME/CFS = I can't afford to get c0v*d
ME/CFS = I can't afford to get c0v*d
Reposted by Dar
“Long COVID is common, affecting up to 10% to 20% of children with a history of COVID-19. With almost 6 million US children potentially affected, this is higher than the number of children with asthma, the most common chronic health problem in children.”
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
Long COVID in Young Children, School-Aged Children, and Teens
This JAMA Pediatrics Patient Page describes the symptoms of long COVID in children.
jamanetwork.com
September 6, 2025 at 7:46 PM
“Long COVID is common, affecting up to 10% to 20% of children with a history of COVID-19. With almost 6 million US children potentially affected, this is higher than the number of children with asthma, the most common chronic health problem in children.”
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
Is my math wrong? They show very low absolute risk: 0.09, 0.18%. What am I missing?
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
October 2, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Is my math wrong? They show very low absolute risk: 0.09, 0.18%. What am I missing?
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
I'm curious about the low absolute risk they found: 0.09%, 0.18%
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
October 2, 2025 at 1:09 PM
I'm curious about the low absolute risk they found: 0.09%, 0.18%
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
RECOVER has previously stated: "incidence of PASC in children... ranging from 4% to 62% across existing large studies, w more studies reporting estimates closer to 10% to 20%"
In the US, when 1 in 60 are infected, our CDC absurdly calls it 'low'
October 1, 2025 at 2:08 AM
In the US, when 1 in 60 are infected, our CDC absurdly calls it 'low'
Dr. Topol, the editorial irresponsibly dismissed masks & air cleaning, which added nothing to their aim.
Of course it's urgent to find treatments for LC, but it was absurd for them to reject reducing transmission. Plenty of evidence supports air cleaning and mask use.
Of course it's urgent to find treatments for LC, but it was absurd for them to reject reducing transmission. Plenty of evidence supports air cleaning and mask use.
September 30, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Dr. Topol, the editorial irresponsibly dismissed masks & air cleaning, which added nothing to their aim.
Of course it's urgent to find treatments for LC, but it was absurd for them to reject reducing transmission. Plenty of evidence supports air cleaning and mask use.
Of course it's urgent to find treatments for LC, but it was absurd for them to reject reducing transmission. Plenty of evidence supports air cleaning and mask use.