The only thing I'm "cherry-picking" is the literal religion's own teachings as described to us on a wide scale. If I disagree with them and some other group disagrees with them, that =/= I agree with the other group.

That's not even what he did. He highlighted how actual Judaism is incompatible with Zionism. YOU brought Argumentum Ad Populum fallacy into this.

Red Herring fallacy, not relevant to the post you're replying to. It would indeed be racist to do that. That hasn't been done here.