Certainly it provides no justification of the government using X as a dissemination channel. For that, you'd need to know how many real UK people view each government Tweet on average. Anyone care to guess what that number might be?

The government corrected figure is such a pointless statistics. Firstly, what does it mean for a 'family' to use X as a source? Secondly, without some idea of how regularly and extensive the usage is, what have we actually learned?

Hopefully this makes the actual size a bit clearer.

Of course happy to sign, but shouldn't this be a petition to parliament? I'm not sure the value of any other online petitions.

Gosh, yes! Would LOVE to mute Zach Polanski's reposts!

From experience, if you push and push and push, they may eventually agree to refund you. The expressions 'not fit for purpose' and 'small claims court' often seem to have an impact.

NYT headline: is Trump's crackdown working? Number of mass shootings drops for a second year in a row.

The amazing thing is, I don't know which movie of his you consider the greatest of all time. At least 3 or 4 of his movies could be given that accolade. I hope you mean The Princess Bride, though.

Why Labour cannot grasp this simple truth, I cannot comprehend.

Quite the evisceration! I almost feel sorry for the guy. Almost.

Right wing commentators right now as the hero of the story turns out to have a foreign name.