@danp83.bsky.social
You can keep repeating yourself, doesn’t make it anymore true.
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
December 3, 2025 at 3:02 PM
You can keep repeating yourself, doesn’t make it anymore true.
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
Really? You really think that hegseth commands the same loyalty among the R’s in congress as trump?
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
December 3, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Really? You really think that hegseth commands the same loyalty among the R’s in congress as trump?
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
Making it all the worse of a decision for the Dems to cave and end the shutdown without some actual concessions. Why trust a “dumpster fire”?
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
December 2, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Making it all the worse of a decision for the Dems to cave and end the shutdown without some actual concessions. Why trust a “dumpster fire”?
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
What a non sequitur….
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
December 2, 2025 at 9:41 PM
What a non sequitur….
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
Great, so maybe they’re finally starting to listen…
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
December 2, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Great, so maybe they’re finally starting to listen…
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
Since they aren’t doing that, we’d settle for “something”. Instead, they cave to republicans regularly and have only strong words and “clever” one-liners at press conferences to deliver.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
December 2, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Since they aren’t doing that, we’d settle for “something”. Instead, they cave to republicans regularly and have only strong words and “clever” one-liners at press conferences to deliver.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
They’re talking about impeaching hegseth, not Trump, in this instance. That distinction matters.
December 2, 2025 at 2:47 PM
They’re talking about impeaching hegseth, not Trump, in this instance. That distinction matters.
That would be too much like actual work though and not at all a strongly worded letter. So, they’ll probably pass on the opportunity so they can get some powerful one-liners in at a press conference. 🙄
December 2, 2025 at 2:33 PM
That would be too much like actual work though and not at all a strongly worded letter. So, they’ll probably pass on the opportunity so they can get some powerful one-liners in at a press conference. 🙄
It was political malpractice to vote for the CR. The people you claim to represent are disappointed in your performance. You failed. Resign.
November 16, 2025 at 4:05 PM
It was political malpractice to vote for the CR. The people you claim to represent are disappointed in your performance. You failed. Resign.
He doesn’t understand it himself. How can he “get it through” to anyone???
November 16, 2025 at 4:03 PM
He doesn’t understand it himself. How can he “get it through” to anyone???
To be fair, Dems in both the senate and house attempted to strip this from the bill and were outvoted by republicans to keep it in.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
November 14, 2025 at 2:37 PM
To be fair, Dems in both the senate and house attempted to strip this from the bill and were outvoted by republicans to keep it in.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
Reposted
Except the Supreme Court already said he can’t do illegal things while acting in his official capacity.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
October 17, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Except the Supreme Court already said he can’t do illegal things while acting in his official capacity.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
Didn’t you say that we had to carry on the important work that Charlie Kirk was doing? THIS is the “important work” that you supported when you said that.
October 15, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Didn’t you say that we had to carry on the important work that Charlie Kirk was doing? THIS is the “important work” that you supported when you said that.
Actually u didn’t even go that far. I said I prefer presidents who don’t attack the homeless.
You all came out of your hair about it.
You all came out of your hair about it.
October 9, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Actually u didn’t even go that far. I said I prefer presidents who don’t attack the homeless.
You all came out of your hair about it.
You all came out of your hair about it.
You invited yourself onto this thread. I was exactly on point for what I was responding to. Not the OP.
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
October 9, 2025 at 9:35 PM
You invited yourself onto this thread. I was exactly on point for what I was responding to. Not the OP.
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
1) discussions are happening now, despite your preference to wait. It’s not all about you and what you are worrying about right now.
2) straw man. I never said he was totally anti-homeless, but that he has attacked homeless people. That is a fact.
3) I wasn’t responding to the OP, but to Swede. 🤷♂️
2) straw man. I never said he was totally anti-homeless, but that he has attacked homeless people. That is a fact.
3) I wasn’t responding to the OP, but to Swede. 🤷♂️
October 9, 2025 at 9:13 PM
1) discussions are happening now, despite your preference to wait. It’s not all about you and what you are worrying about right now.
2) straw man. I never said he was totally anti-homeless, but that he has attacked homeless people. That is a fact.
3) I wasn’t responding to the OP, but to Swede. 🤷♂️
2) straw man. I never said he was totally anti-homeless, but that he has attacked homeless people. That is a fact.
3) I wasn’t responding to the OP, but to Swede. 🤷♂️
Still haven’t answered why you prefer politicians who attack the homeless.
Typical blue maga. “Vote blue no matter who”. 🙄
Get some morals.
Typical blue maga. “Vote blue no matter who”. 🙄
Get some morals.
October 9, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Still haven’t answered why you prefer politicians who attack the homeless.
Typical blue maga. “Vote blue no matter who”. 🙄
Get some morals.
Typical blue maga. “Vote blue no matter who”. 🙄
Get some morals.
You’ve made not even a single attempt to answer any of the questions I’ve posed while expecting me to do your research homework for you.
Is it really surprising I refused to play your little game?
Is it really surprising I refused to play your little game?
October 9, 2025 at 8:33 PM
You’ve made not even a single attempt to answer any of the questions I’ve posed while expecting me to do your research homework for you.
Is it really surprising I refused to play your little game?
Is it really surprising I refused to play your little game?
The topic of the post I responded to what his fitness as a president/candidate for president.
I think his record is relevant to that discussion. Why do you feel it isn’t?
I think his record is relevant to that discussion. Why do you feel it isn’t?
October 9, 2025 at 8:30 PM
The topic of the post I responded to what his fitness as a president/candidate for president.
I think his record is relevant to that discussion. Why do you feel it isn’t?
I think his record is relevant to that discussion. Why do you feel it isn’t?