dannnyp.bsky.social
@dannnyp.bsky.social
Harbaugh has made some strange choices today with his personnel.
September 28, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Harbaugh has made some strange choices today with his personnel.
Get him out of here! He stinks
September 28, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Get him out of here! He stinks
Thank you 🥹
But for real, the work you, Bill, Angelo, Ian, Bryant (RIP), et al have done over the years has been a godsend for a guy looking to become a more thoughtful, knowledgable, and curious film watcher.
A respite from the deluge of mush, slop, and other inanities masquerading as ‘criticism’
But for real, the work you, Bill, Angelo, Ian, Bryant (RIP), et al have done over the years has been a godsend for a guy looking to become a more thoughtful, knowledgable, and curious film watcher.
A respite from the deluge of mush, slop, and other inanities masquerading as ‘criticism’
September 7, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Thank you 🥹
But for real, the work you, Bill, Angelo, Ian, Bryant (RIP), et al have done over the years has been a godsend for a guy looking to become a more thoughtful, knowledgable, and curious film watcher.
A respite from the deluge of mush, slop, and other inanities masquerading as ‘criticism’
But for real, the work you, Bill, Angelo, Ian, Bryant (RIP), et al have done over the years has been a godsend for a guy looking to become a more thoughtful, knowledgable, and curious film watcher.
A respite from the deluge of mush, slop, and other inanities masquerading as ‘criticism’
Little does he know that film freak central kicks ass.
September 7, 2025 at 4:35 PM
Little does he know that film freak central kicks ass.
Thanks, I’m glad to have convinced you! Have a goodnight my man
September 6, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Thanks, I’m glad to have convinced you! Have a goodnight my man
Yeah as I stated earlier: I think the data at large backs up the theory which is the most likely.
Data can be skewed a million ways. This is why I don’t trust anyone whose theory is fundamentally unbelievable. They have an agenda to which they’ll cherry pick/misconstrue data to fit their goal
Data can be skewed a million ways. This is why I don’t trust anyone whose theory is fundamentally unbelievable. They have an agenda to which they’ll cherry pick/misconstrue data to fit their goal
September 6, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Yeah as I stated earlier: I think the data at large backs up the theory which is the most likely.
Data can be skewed a million ways. This is why I don’t trust anyone whose theory is fundamentally unbelievable. They have an agenda to which they’ll cherry pick/misconstrue data to fit their goal
Data can be skewed a million ways. This is why I don’t trust anyone whose theory is fundamentally unbelievable. They have an agenda to which they’ll cherry pick/misconstrue data to fit their goal
Serious question: If your theory is laughable, why would your data be trustworthy?
September 6, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Serious question: If your theory is laughable, why would your data be trustworthy?
Occam’s razor comes into play. Home teams tend to get more calls in their favor. The chiefs, more than any team the past 8 years, have tended to play most of their games at home in the playoffs.
If the Browns continually played the AFC title game at Huntington Bank field, it would look similar
If the Browns continually played the AFC title game at Huntington Bank field, it would look similar
September 6, 2025 at 3:35 AM
Occam’s razor comes into play. Home teams tend to get more calls in their favor. The chiefs, more than any team the past 8 years, have tended to play most of their games at home in the playoffs.
If the Browns continually played the AFC title game at Huntington Bank field, it would look similar
If the Browns continually played the AFC title game at Huntington Bank field, it would look similar
Oh it’s very dismissive lol. Because it’s junk.
If you’re arguing that the nfl is giving the chiefs favorable calls for monetary reasons, that means: A) Roger Goodell implicitly/explicitly signed off on it.
Do you think 31 other owners not named Clark Hunt would let him do this?
If you’re arguing that the nfl is giving the chiefs favorable calls for monetary reasons, that means: A) Roger Goodell implicitly/explicitly signed off on it.
Do you think 31 other owners not named Clark Hunt would let him do this?
September 6, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Oh it’s very dismissive lol. Because it’s junk.
If you’re arguing that the nfl is giving the chiefs favorable calls for monetary reasons, that means: A) Roger Goodell implicitly/explicitly signed off on it.
Do you think 31 other owners not named Clark Hunt would let him do this?
If you’re arguing that the nfl is giving the chiefs favorable calls for monetary reasons, that means: A) Roger Goodell implicitly/explicitly signed off on it.
Do you think 31 other owners not named Clark Hunt would let him do this?
Ha ok. Here’s actual evidence and not whatever that is.
Basically they’ve gotten a normal amount of positive whistles for a home team in the playoffs. They’re just always at home (because they’re dominant)
Basically they’ve gotten a normal amount of positive whistles for a home team in the playoffs. They’re just always at home (because they’re dominant)
September 6, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Ha ok. Here’s actual evidence and not whatever that is.
Basically they’ve gotten a normal amount of positive whistles for a home team in the playoffs. They’re just always at home (because they’re dominant)
Basically they’ve gotten a normal amount of positive whistles for a home team in the playoffs. They’re just always at home (because they’re dominant)
FWIW, the actual stats don’t co-sign the “chiefs always get the whistle” takes
September 6, 2025 at 3:07 AM
FWIW, the actual stats don’t co-sign the “chiefs always get the whistle” takes
Sure. I think I agree. I guess we’re arguing different things tbh
September 6, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Sure. I think I agree. I guess we’re arguing different things tbh
lol not really?
My point is that people will disregard the poor officiating tonight, but in a game later this year when they get all the calls we’ll never hear the end of it.
My point is that people will disregard the poor officiating tonight, but in a game later this year when they get all the calls we’ll never hear the end of it.
September 6, 2025 at 3:03 AM
lol not really?
My point is that people will disregard the poor officiating tonight, but in a game later this year when they get all the calls we’ll never hear the end of it.
My point is that people will disregard the poor officiating tonight, but in a game later this year when they get all the calls we’ll never hear the end of it.
Ok but when it benefits the chiefs we get 4000 AI generated pics of Mahomes tongue kissing the zebras.
September 6, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Ok but when it benefits the chiefs we get 4000 AI generated pics of Mahomes tongue kissing the zebras.
That last td very much shouldn’t have counted, in fairness
September 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM
That last td very much shouldn’t have counted, in fairness
Josh Fogg…we love him, don’t we??
What a career he had. A real killer out there
For too long they told us “oh don’t talk about Josh Fogg. Mr. President, you can’t do that.”
But we’re gonna talk about Josh Fogg again, and we’re looking very closely at hall of fame and that’s all I’ll say. Stay tuned
What a career he had. A real killer out there
For too long they told us “oh don’t talk about Josh Fogg. Mr. President, you can’t do that.”
But we’re gonna talk about Josh Fogg again, and we’re looking very closely at hall of fame and that’s all I’ll say. Stay tuned
September 3, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Josh Fogg…we love him, don’t we??
What a career he had. A real killer out there
For too long they told us “oh don’t talk about Josh Fogg. Mr. President, you can’t do that.”
But we’re gonna talk about Josh Fogg again, and we’re looking very closely at hall of fame and that’s all I’ll say. Stay tuned
What a career he had. A real killer out there
For too long they told us “oh don’t talk about Josh Fogg. Mr. President, you can’t do that.”
But we’re gonna talk about Josh Fogg again, and we’re looking very closely at hall of fame and that’s all I’ll say. Stay tuned