Danielle Lang
banner
danilang-votes.bsky.social
Danielle Lang
@danilang-votes.bsky.social
Sr Dir., Voting, Campaign Legal Center. Former legal aid lawyer. You can also find me on Substack: https://theonlypollsthatcount.substack.com/
Barrett: "are you really going answer Justice Kagan by saying that result can never be achieved expeditiously"?
May 15, 2025 at 2:38 PM
something about class cert?
May 15, 2025 at 2:33 PM
And while the DOJ could never do all the work needed to enforce the VRA (and has never even been aggressive in doing so), THIS DOJ has abandoned all its cases enforcing the VRA and gutted the voting section (last estimate I saw was it is down to 3 attorneys).
May 14, 2025 at 3:29 PM
There will certainly be an appeal here. But these principles are the bedrock of our democracy and, assuming they hold in this case, they should be a lesson to those who would follow Judge Griffin's sore loser playbook.
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
And the judge sums it all up:
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
And as to Judge Griffin's cherry-picking of voters to challenge only in certain counties, the district court notes that Judge Griffin is an interested litigant that shouldn't be allowed to pick which voters are subject to his new rules. This violates Equal Protection.
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
On changing the rules after the game is played:
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Yesterday, a federal district court judge (appointed by Trump, not that that should matter) said no. I'd like to share some key quotes from that opinion, which I think say it all.
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Shamefully, the NC Supreme Court took the bait on this gamesmanship and granted his request to exclude thousands of overseas and mail voters from the count unless they come forward in short order six months after the election to "cure" their ballots.
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
His challenges would mean that overseas and military voters that followed every instruction given to them would be disenfranchised just because he contends those instructions should have been different. But those rules were settled before the election and he never challenged them then.
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
The case in a nutshell is that Judge Griffin lost his race for the NC Supreme Court. Unable to accept that loss, he has cherrypicked thousands of voters to challenge -- but his challenges are based on attempts to change the rules in place at the time of the election.
May 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM
And proud to work alongside all the other lawyers and clients suing to right this wrong on behalf of American voters.
April 24, 2025 at 5:46 PM