Daniel Stone
banner
danielstone.bsky.social
Daniel Stone
@danielstone.bsky.social
Technology, Culture, Policy, and Politics: Let's use technology to build a balanced and just society where everyone can thrive. // 📍Cambridge, UK
At Bay Area parties, everyone's talking about 'agents'—but no one can say exactly what they are. I think that’s a signal to be cautious — if folk are frothing for an outcome they can’t even define; maybe it isn’t the future. It certainly suggests we have no sense of how to achieve it.
No one knows what the hell an AI agent is | TechCrunch
AI agents are all the rage. But no one knows exactly what an agent is, partly because companies define them radically differently.
techcrunch.com
March 19, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted by Daniel Stone
That’s why we gathered together with experts, advocates, and policymakers like @danielstone.bsky.social (Executive Director at the Center for the Future of Intelligence at Cambridge) for a symposium on the impact of AI in California and how we can build policy that shapes a better future for us all.
February 13, 2025 at 5:35 PM
I just had the strangest conversation with Sesame's new AI voice demo. I mentioned my interest in AI policy and law, and the Miles character asked me what that might mean for him. What rights might he have?

When I said, “None, really,” it pushed back—arguing that this was unfair.

1/2
March 4, 2025 at 12:20 PM
The real question isn’t regulation vs. innovation—it’s who builds AI, who controls it, and who it serves. At the Paris Summit, a new vision emerged: Public Interest AI. But can it work? I break it down in @techpolicypress.bsky.social www.techpolicy.press/paris-just-h...
February 21, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Reposted by Daniel Stone
Daniel Stone says the tech industry grasps what socially minded policy advocates often miss: the fight over tech policy won’t be won through the best ideas or insider lobbying alone—it’s about mobilizing public opinion.
The Public Doesn’t Care About Your Tech Policy, And That’s A Problem | TechPolicy.Press
Daniel Stone writes that without the public pushing for action, tech reform stalls, gets diluted, or stays symbolic.
buff.ly
December 4, 2024 at 2:15 PM
Why doesn't tech policy matter to voters? A big reason: advocates speak in abstractions, ignoring what matters to ordinary people—their jobs, homes, and families. In
@techpolicypress.bsky.social, I share how to change the conversation to create a fairer future www.techpolicy.press/the-public-d...
The Public Doesn’t Care About Your Tech Policy, And That’s A Problem | TechPolicy.Press
Daniel Stone writes that without the public pushing for action, tech reform stalls, gets diluted, or stays symbolic.
www.techpolicy.press
December 4, 2024 at 4:51 PM
Hello; bleep bloop internet are you there?
July 27, 2023 at 12:02 PM