Daniel Read
banner
danielread.bsky.social
Daniel Read
@danielread.bsky.social
Professor of Behavioural Science, University of Warwick.
Associate editor, Management Science
Google scholar:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=uhMoc_8AAAAJ&hl=en
Strategic Information Network: https://sites.google.com/view/strategicinf
Londoners are emotional, the rest are wondering what happened to HS2.
November 11, 2025 at 8:15 AM
Surely people making applications can do the same thing. And they have the advantage as the first mover.
November 9, 2025 at 12:49 PM
I expect many people go a bit nuts when they age. Not sure whether great men or more or less likely to but unless we know this it cannot be called a phenomenon, nor subjected to causal analysis.
November 9, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Need to be careful. I doubt he said this.
November 9, 2025 at 9:08 AM
Are you saying that if Trump could own slaves he would not?
November 9, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Many Labour voters too.
November 9, 2025 at 8:44 AM
can you provide me with an image of the brain highlighting the visual cortex and visual pathways. Is it wrong?
November 7, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Yes that is what I mean. Are they receiving less from the firms than before? Otherwise its just an accounting trick. I have a pretty good idea what we would learn, but would like to have it checked.
November 5, 2025 at 11:06 AM
If the firms know that bonuses are being blocked then they will compensate other ways. The question you (The Guardian) should try to answer is whether total compensation has dropped due to the new rules.
November 5, 2025 at 10:24 AM
The only puzzle is why it took the journal so long to accept.
November 2, 2025 at 12:40 PM
I expect what you will find is that people like to acknowledge big names to give their work extra credibility. How could this be corrected for in a collegiality analysis?
November 2, 2025 at 9:09 AM
Strange how this review makes it sound like the film is probably quite good.
October 31, 2025 at 3:51 PM
I think that is the current meaning. I don't understand the hate for the term which is about as innocuous as a term can be.
October 30, 2025 at 2:00 PM
"Hard to believe" is used to mean something like "it is difficult to comprehend emotionally." This misunderstanding might explain the mass phenomenon too.
October 29, 2025 at 10:35 AM