3- to confirm new medications,they test to stop projects that have heavy side effects, & the side effects is not a high number like 10% 20%, it means u may never see anybody with side effects around bcuz atleast the c19 vax is based on science.
I found it super risky to take it for a flu like thing

2-They said mrna doesnt need test, but based on what study!? If the medications that come from perfect science/equasions that made sense, needed testing, now the mrna that does make sense doesnt need testing!?
trying to say :nomatter how sure,everything need practical confirmation (test)

1- Science:"corelation is not causation" meanwhile 80-90% of all our biology science are based on "corelation based" studies, which is UNRELIABLE ! Thats why weve always tested our medications until c19 vax!
(Havent u asked urself why on earth do they test their medications !? I did)

in 2024 u still complain about ppl not wearing mask, as if ur still in the middle of pandemic and u have no clue what is the outcome of the pandemic, in my circle of thousands of ppl w no mask,the number ppl who died of c19 wasnt different than the number died from normal flu. What about u ?

U got lucky, ignore the wild theories, the vax was as dangerus as an unproperly tested vax, nothing more.

In my family theres ppl who got paralized by normal vaxes (it was "properly tested", biology science is not 100% reliable, less testing = more chance of side effects, not 30%-50%, way less)