Yea that CPS shit is wild huh

If you’re genuinely curious, this is a concise rebuttal from that creator youtu.be/QgvvLoCT4Xc?...

It was intended as a hit piece to mirror the nuke. If you are genuinely still interested at all, I think this live was a better, concise look into the poor informational value of the nuke. I can’t remember if BE retreaded all this in the tsar so I apologize if it was

youtu.be/QgvvLoCT4Xc?...

Saying “my view on this conflict isn’t changed by whether or not people were raped” is not the same as “I don’t care about rape”, so i’d like to be clear about what we’re talking about here.

If you ask me, yes, I would say the first position isn’t inherently damning, like the second is.

If you have a link, I need a refresher on that clip. Not that hasan hasnt made infamously gross comments about SA.

What I do recall is piker saying 1. There is evidence and testimony of oct 7 victims of rape
2. His position on the conflict does not hinge on whether or not rapes happened.

I’m more interested what you think about any of the cases where badempanada adds back full context that was clipped from the nuke.

Frankly i’m not interested in changing opinions. I’m more concerned with the criticisms the nuke levies being incomplete or dishonest. It takes away from the valid ones

Go watch the BE video then, he does exactly that. Sorry but I’m not interested in retreading long long covered territory. I’ve been well aware of most of these clips since long before the nuke. In their original context their not particularly damning in my honest opinion.

The video I’m talking about displays the full context of many of the clips that were in the nuke. They’re not that damning. The video h3 posted a few days ago is far more valid criticism than anything in the nuke.

Why should I trust that video when it’s full of dishonest framing?

There’s a 4hr BE video picking apart in meticulous detail the ways in which the “nuke” was equally misleading and dishonest about what he believes. What reason do I have to believe one over the other

Let me be clear, I mean in comparison to western media, which tends to treat equally violent acts that are committed by US-aligned hegemonic powers as “the unfortunate cost of business” aka not really that critical, while acts of violence committed by rebel groups are treated as some unique evil

I think more just generally anti-imperialist and therefore not really that critical of rebel groups resisting outside invading forces in the same way that most of western media is when those groups are rebelling against interests which preserve America global hegemony

Dang why is she free on switch?

Fortnite default dance music