While Team B only conceded 0-3 off KOs. Their decision to drop off limits turnover opportunities in good areas and therefore limits scoring return. Their successful TOs were in deep areas of the pitch.

Interesting pattern.The right side always a challenge from a conversion perspective.

Overall, team A forced 23 KOs to 17 so I imagine they dominated Team
B kick out with a high press therefore the turning over in good attacking areas against unstructured defence.

Yes if you are looking at scores conceded (outcome).

Question: Do turnovers include team B KOs or just turnovers in general play?