·•·•·DaemoniKira·•·•·
@daemonikira.bsky.social
🕸️ Level 30 Nazgûl
🕸️ Half Japanese
🕸️ Metalhead Forever🤘🏻
🕸️ Gamer
🕸️ She/It
🕸️ Spiritual as fuck ☯️
🕸️ Lucifer loves you
🕸️ Oh, by the way......
FUCK TRUMP, FUCK FASCISTS,
& FUCK ANIMAL ABUSE
🕸️ Half Japanese
🕸️ Metalhead Forever🤘🏻
🕸️ Gamer
🕸️ She/It
🕸️ Spiritual as fuck ☯️
🕸️ Lucifer loves you
🕸️ Oh, by the way......
FUCK TRUMP, FUCK FASCISTS,
& FUCK ANIMAL ABUSE
I can't find the post anymore, but someone here made a comment that went something like "I'd love to hear him try to pronounce 'acetaminophen'."
I just saw this. And I had to find the comment. I couldn't find it though, so I hope the person who made it happens to read this and laugh. ☺️❤️
I just saw this. And I had to find the comment. I couldn't find it though, so I hope the person who made it happens to read this and laugh. ☺️❤️
September 23, 2025 at 8:37 AM
I can't find the post anymore, but someone here made a comment that went something like "I'd love to hear him try to pronounce 'acetaminophen'."
I just saw this. And I had to find the comment. I couldn't find it though, so I hope the person who made it happens to read this and laugh. ☺️❤️
I just saw this. And I had to find the comment. I couldn't find it though, so I hope the person who made it happens to read this and laugh. ☺️❤️
That was fast. I'd heard the blowback was IMMENSE, but I really didn't think Disney would cave. And so quickly! Wow!
Just goes to show that businesses, ultimately, care most about one thing: money. If something threatens that, that threat is immediately and swiftly removed.
Just goes to show that businesses, ultimately, care most about one thing: money. If something threatens that, that threat is immediately and swiftly removed.
September 23, 2025 at 12:21 AM
That was fast. I'd heard the blowback was IMMENSE, but I really didn't think Disney would cave. And so quickly! Wow!
Just goes to show that businesses, ultimately, care most about one thing: money. If something threatens that, that threat is immediately and swiftly removed.
Just goes to show that businesses, ultimately, care most about one thing: money. If something threatens that, that threat is immediately and swiftly removed.
South Park has more favorable ratings than the Trump Administration—by quite a lot!
For someone who cares so deeply about "ratings" over *literally anything else*, I sure hope that stings.
I wonder if that was Matt & Trey's goal? Or perhaps their prize is a real Trump tantrum 😁
For someone who cares so deeply about "ratings" over *literally anything else*, I sure hope that stings.
I wonder if that was Matt & Trey's goal? Or perhaps their prize is a real Trump tantrum 😁
August 11, 2025 at 3:58 PM
South Park has more favorable ratings than the Trump Administration—by quite a lot!
For someone who cares so deeply about "ratings" over *literally anything else*, I sure hope that stings.
I wonder if that was Matt & Trey's goal? Or perhaps their prize is a real Trump tantrum 😁
For someone who cares so deeply about "ratings" over *literally anything else*, I sure hope that stings.
I wonder if that was Matt & Trey's goal? Or perhaps their prize is a real Trump tantrum 😁
share.libbyapp.com/title/5714566
Somehow, I think the description doesn't quite match the title/cover of the book 🤔
#Libby
Somehow, I think the description doesn't quite match the title/cover of the book 🤔
#Libby
July 31, 2025 at 4:28 PM
share.libbyapp.com/title/5714566
Somehow, I think the description doesn't quite match the title/cover of the book 🤔
#Libby
Somehow, I think the description doesn't quite match the title/cover of the book 🤔
#Libby
the Prince of Darkness has returned to his rightful realm.
goodbye, legend.
goodbye, legend.
July 22, 2025 at 8:18 PM
the Prince of Darkness has returned to his rightful realm.
goodbye, legend.
goodbye, legend.
This is the first time I've ever played "Scattergories". All answers must fit the topic and begin with the letter assigned. The topic was "Space Agencies" and the letter was "N".
Naturally, I guessed "NASA".
Somehow, it tells me "NASA doesn't start with 'N'."
Interesting. 🤔
Naturally, I guessed "NASA".
Somehow, it tells me "NASA doesn't start with 'N'."
Interesting. 🤔
June 30, 2025 at 8:39 PM
This is the first time I've ever played "Scattergories". All answers must fit the topic and begin with the letter assigned. The topic was "Space Agencies" and the letter was "N".
Naturally, I guessed "NASA".
Somehow, it tells me "NASA doesn't start with 'N'."
Interesting. 🤔
Naturally, I guessed "NASA".
Somehow, it tells me "NASA doesn't start with 'N'."
Interesting. 🤔
Sooooo we should get rid of every single person who endorsed this abusive creep Cuomo. Each endorsement is a huge slap in the faces of the 11 women who were harassed by him & then retaliated against by his office.
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
June 23, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Sooooo we should get rid of every single person who endorsed this abusive creep Cuomo. Each endorsement is a huge slap in the faces of the 11 women who were harassed by him & then retaliated against by his office.
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
Sooo we should get rid of every single person who endorsed this abusive creep Cuomo. Each endorsement is a huge slap in the faces of the 11 women who were harassed by him & then retaliated against by his office.
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
June 23, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Sooo we should get rid of every single person who endorsed this abusive creep Cuomo. Each endorsement is a huge slap in the faces of the 11 women who were harassed by him & then retaliated against by his office.
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
These people should not be anywhere near lawmaking.
www.politico.com/news/2024/01...
If American society is going to crumble b/c it's deporting all the people that do all the jobs Americans don't want to do, then maybe it should cease deporting them.
& if they're so critically important to one industry, then why wouldn't they be to many industries?
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/u...
& if they're so critically important to one industry, then why wouldn't they be to many industries?
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/u...
June 16, 2025 at 10:09 PM
If American society is going to crumble b/c it's deporting all the people that do all the jobs Americans don't want to do, then maybe it should cease deporting them.
& if they're so critically important to one industry, then why wouldn't they be to many industries?
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/u...
& if they're so critically important to one industry, then why wouldn't they be to many industries?
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/u...
Thank you very much for providing the source, I really do appreciate it, truly.
This is truly horrific. It's a tragedy Rep. Hortman and her husband were killed -- luckily, Sen. Hoffman and his wife are recovering today after surgery.
I'm glad there weren't more victims. This is insane.
This is truly horrific. It's a tragedy Rep. Hortman and her husband were killed -- luckily, Sen. Hoffman and his wife are recovering today after surgery.
I'm glad there weren't more victims. This is insane.
June 15, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Thank you very much for providing the source, I really do appreciate it, truly.
This is truly horrific. It's a tragedy Rep. Hortman and her husband were killed -- luckily, Sen. Hoffman and his wife are recovering today after surgery.
I'm glad there weren't more victims. This is insane.
This is truly horrific. It's a tragedy Rep. Hortman and her husband were killed -- luckily, Sen. Hoffman and his wife are recovering today after surgery.
I'm glad there weren't more victims. This is insane.
I suspect the assassinations of D-MN lawmaker & her husband, & attempted assassination of another D-MN lawmaker, may actually be a false flag "propaganda of the deed" operation.
The goal?
• Provoke civilians into violence → martial law
• Provoke civilians into violence → civil war
Stay safe.
The goal?
• Provoke civilians into violence → martial law
• Provoke civilians into violence → civil war
Stay safe.
June 14, 2025 at 7:07 PM
I suspect the assassinations of D-MN lawmaker & her husband, & attempted assassination of another D-MN lawmaker, may actually be a false flag "propaganda of the deed" operation.
The goal?
• Provoke civilians into violence → martial law
• Provoke civilians into violence → civil war
Stay safe.
The goal?
• Provoke civilians into violence → martial law
• Provoke civilians into violence → civil war
Stay safe.
This is looking more and more like a classic false flag operation -- something with which someone like Boelter, with his "security situation" experience in the Middle East & Africa, would be intimately familiar.
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
June 14, 2025 at 6:25 PM
This is looking more and more like a classic false flag operation -- something with which someone like Boelter, with his "security situation" experience in the Middle East & Africa, would be intimately familiar.
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
This is looking more and more like a classic false flag operation -- something with which someone like Boelter, with his "security situation" experience in the Middle East & Africa, would be intimately familiar.
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
June 14, 2025 at 6:21 PM
This is looking more and more like a classic false flag operation -- something with which someone like Boelter, with his "security situation" experience in the Middle East & Africa, would be intimately familiar.
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
The timing of it is what tipped me off to the false flag possibility: the night before
Perhaps he considered this some kind of insane "marketing strategy": go into the home of a high-profile person, slay them, then say "if they had my services, this wouldn't have happened"?
I mean, whoever assassinated Rep Hortman (RIP) & tried to kill Sen Hoffman is clearly a fucking nutcase.
I mean, whoever assassinated Rep Hortman (RIP) & tried to kill Sen Hoffman is clearly a fucking nutcase.
June 14, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Perhaps he considered this some kind of insane "marketing strategy": go into the home of a high-profile person, slay them, then say "if they had my services, this wouldn't have happened"?
I mean, whoever assassinated Rep Hortman (RIP) & tried to kill Sen Hoffman is clearly a fucking nutcase.
I mean, whoever assassinated Rep Hortman (RIP) & tried to kill Sen Hoffman is clearly a fucking nutcase.
Trump in October 2024:
"Democrats are weaponizing the DOJ!"
Trump after becoming President again:
*weaponizes the DOJ and makes them his personal attack squad*
"Democrats are weaponizing the DOJ!"
Trump after becoming President again:
*weaponizes the DOJ and makes them his personal attack squad*
June 13, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Trump in October 2024:
"Democrats are weaponizing the DOJ!"
Trump after becoming President again:
*weaponizes the DOJ and makes them his personal attack squad*
"Democrats are weaponizing the DOJ!"
Trump after becoming President again:
*weaponizes the DOJ and makes them his personal attack squad*
And here's a screenshot of its response just before I re-prompted for the above response, in which it lists some of the points that ARE actually in the bill.
If you want details of those points, just use the link to carry on the conversation from there, in your chat:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
If you want details of those points, just use the link to carry on the conversation from there, in your chat:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:20 PM
And here's a screenshot of its response just before I re-prompted for the above response, in which it lists some of the points that ARE actually in the bill.
If you want details of those points, just use the link to carry on the conversation from there, in your chat:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
If you want details of those points, just use the link to carry on the conversation from there, in your chat:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
The last 2 claims/screenshots, plus the nice little table at the end (sorry it looks wonky, I had to stitch two screenshots together).
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:20 PM
The last 2 claims/screenshots, plus the nice little table at the end (sorry it looks wonky, I had to stitch two screenshots together).
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
The next 4 claims / screenshots
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
June 2, 2025 at 7:20 PM
The next 4 claims / screenshots
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
So, I uploaded the image & the entire H.R.1 bill to ChatGPT & asked it "Are all these points actually in this H.R.1 bill? Are they accurate/could they be construed as plausible?"
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:20 PM
So, I uploaded the image & the entire H.R.1 bill to ChatGPT & asked it "Are all these points actually in this H.R.1 bill? Are they accurate/could they be construed as plausible?"
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
The last 2 claims/screenshots, plus the nice little table at the end (sorry it looks wonky, I had to stitch two screenshots together).
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:13 PM
The last 2 claims/screenshots, plus the nice little table at the end (sorry it looks wonky, I had to stitch two screenshots together).
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
The next 4 claims / screenshots
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
June 2, 2025 at 7:13 PM
The next 4 claims / screenshots
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
So, I uploaded the image & the entire H.R.1 bill to ChatGPT & asked it "Are all these points actually in this H.R.1 bill? Are they accurate/could they be construed as plausible?"
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:13 PM
So, I uploaded the image & the entire H.R.1 bill to ChatGPT & asked it "Are all these points actually in this H.R.1 bill? Are they accurate/could they be construed as plausible?"
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
The last 2 claims/screenshots, plus the nice little table at the end (sorry it looks wonky, I had to stitch two screenshots together).
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:11 PM
The last 2 claims/screenshots, plus the nice little table at the end (sorry it looks wonky, I had to stitch two screenshots together).
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
The next 4 claims / screenshots
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
June 2, 2025 at 7:11 PM
The next 4 claims / screenshots
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Above is the link to the full chat; it's not long. These screenshots are of its last response, after I prompted it to include an analysis of the bill based on not JUST the literal language, but also plausible interpretations.
So, I uploaded the image & the entire H.R.1 bill to ChatGPT & asked it "Are all these points actually in this H.R.1 bill? Are they accurate/could they be construed as plausible?"
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
June 2, 2025 at 7:11 PM
So, I uploaded the image & the entire H.R.1 bill to ChatGPT & asked it "Are all these points actually in this H.R.1 bill? Are they accurate/could they be construed as plausible?"
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...
Verdict: ½ are false, ¼ are misleading, 1 is partially true, and the last is fully true:
chatgpt.com/share/683df2...