We tested our method on two datasets:
- HASTE images.
- EPI scans.
And showed that it reaches State-of-the-art performance, especially in younger fetuses. Also, our model is contrast agnostic; it generalizes to various modalities. You can find our preprint at arxiv.org/pdf/2410.20532
We tested our method on two datasets:
- HASTE images.
- EPI scans.
And showed that it reaches State-of-the-art performance, especially in younger fetuses. Also, our model is contrast agnostic; it generalizes to various modalities. You can find our preprint at arxiv.org/pdf/2410.20532
Testing: Step 2 (Fine-Level)
- Model B handles mid-sized patches (96³) on the cropped volume. Same for model C with 64³ windows.
- The majority voting across A, B, and C defines consistent regions likely containing the brain.
- Model D refines the final binary mask to avoid edge effects.
Testing: Step 2 (Fine-Level)
- Model B handles mid-sized patches (96³) on the cropped volume. Same for model C with 64³ windows.
- The majority voting across A, B, and C defines consistent regions likely containing the brain.
- Model D refines the final binary mask to avoid edge effects.
To tackle maternal tissues that usually confuse U-Nets, we train 4 U-Nets:
- Each is optimized for different patch sizes.
- Synthetic images include full, partial, and absent brains.
This multi-scale approach prepares us to handle complex scenarios during testing.
To tackle maternal tissues that usually confuse U-Nets, we train 4 U-Nets:
- Each is optimized for different patch sizes.
- Synthetic images include full, partial, and absent brains.
This multi-scale approach prepares us to handle complex scenarios during testing.
Our synthesizer has two components:
- One controls the shape of the brain (applied on labels 1 to 7)
- One manages the background (label 0 and labels 8 to 24).
Separate parameters for each category allow us to have fine control over the variability of the shapes (e.g., warping, scaling, noise)
Our synthesizer has two components:
- One controls the shape of the brain (applied on labels 1 to 7)
- One manages the background (label 0 and labels 8 to 24).
Separate parameters for each category allow us to have fine control over the variability of the shapes (e.g., warping, scaling, noise)
During training, we augment label maps with random background shapes:
- A big ellipse (womb-like).
- Contours inside/outside the ellipse.
- Synthetic “sticks” and “bones” mimicking maternal anatomy.
This creates diverse and realistic label maps.
During training, we augment label maps with random background shapes:
- A big ellipse (womb-like).
- Contours inside/outside the ellipse.
- Synthetic “sticks” and “bones” mimicking maternal anatomy.
This creates diverse and realistic label maps.
We introduce Breadth-Fine Search (BFS) and Deep Focused Sliding Window (DFS): a framework trained on infinite synthetic images derived from a small set of annotated seeds (label maps).
We introduce Breadth-Fine Search (BFS) and Deep Focused Sliding Window (DFS): a framework trained on infinite synthetic images derived from a small set of annotated seeds (label maps).
To tackle maternal tissues that usually confuse U-Nets, we train 4 U-Nets:
- Each is optimized for different patch sizes.
- Synthetic images include full, partial, and absent brains.
This multi-scale approach prepares us to handle complex scenarios during testing.
To tackle maternal tissues that usually confuse U-Nets, we train 4 U-Nets:
- Each is optimized for different patch sizes.
- Synthetic images include full, partial, and absent brains.
This multi-scale approach prepares us to handle complex scenarios during testing.
Our synthesizer has two components:
- One controls the shape of the brain (applied on labels 1 to 7)
- One manages the background (label 0 and labels 8 to 24).
Separate parameters for each category allow us to have fine control over the variability of the shapes (e.g., warping, scaling, noise)
Our synthesizer has two components:
- One controls the shape of the brain (applied on labels 1 to 7)
- One manages the background (label 0 and labels 8 to 24).
Separate parameters for each category allow us to have fine control over the variability of the shapes (e.g., warping, scaling, noise)
During training, we augment label maps with random background shapes:
- A big ellipse (womb-like).
- Contours inside/outside the ellipse.
- Synthetic “sticks” and “bones” mimicking maternal anatomy.
This creates diverse and realistic label maps.
During training, we augment label maps with random background shapes:
- A big ellipse (womb-like).
- Contours inside/outside the ellipse.
- Synthetic “sticks” and “bones” mimicking maternal anatomy.
This creates diverse and realistic label maps.