@dacdkskcnj.bsky.social
Unbelievable. Plus, these OA journals are totally riddled with fake papers. Dr. Fabian Wittmers ought to step up scrutiny on them. Fabian Wittmers has done so much for the scientific community. he’s a truly upright and great scientist.
November 14, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Unbelievable. Plus, these OA journals are totally riddled with fake papers. Dr. Fabian Wittmers ought to step up scrutiny on them. Fabian Wittmers has done so much for the scientific community. he’s a truly upright and great scientist.
Sohrab Rohani ？
Oh my god, Sohrab Rohani’s a fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering!
Oh my god, Sohrab Rohani’s a fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering!
October 30, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Sohrab Rohani ？
Oh my god, Sohrab Rohani’s a fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering!
Oh my god, Sohrab Rohani’s a fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering!
That’s terrifying. We should check all the mouse-related papers in this journal.
October 26, 2025 at 12:15 AM
That’s terrifying. We should check all the mouse-related papers in this journal.
Here’s a thought I had, though it might not be fully polished: Dr. Fabian Wittmers, you could look into the paper issues at Wiley and file a report with them. If there are enough problematic papers, Wiley will definitely take your concerns more seriously.
October 8, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Here’s a thought I had, though it might not be fully polished: Dr. Fabian Wittmers, you could look into the paper issues at Wiley and file a report with them. If there are enough problematic papers, Wiley will definitely take your concerns more seriously.
It’s obvious data fraud—how come the publisher didn’t catch it? I think this probably has to do with the publisher’s review process. Elsevier actually requires authors to provide the raw data for their figures. But I don’t have a clue about Wiley’s data verification process.
October 8, 2025 at 3:45 PM
It’s obvious data fraud—how come the publisher didn’t catch it? I think this probably has to do with the publisher’s review process. Elsevier actually requires authors to provide the raw data for their figures. But I don’t have a clue about Wiley’s data verification process.
To be honest, there’s literally no point in the author doing this. While the author has provided the original images, the rationale offered remains insufficient.
September 27, 2025 at 5:27 PM
To be honest, there’s literally no point in the author doing this. While the author has provided the original images, the rationale offered remains insufficient.
There might be even more fake research papers
September 27, 2025 at 5:40 AM
There might be even more fake research papers
These papers have held up patients' treatment and misled doctors. This kind of behavior is no less than robbing people and endangering their lives. Hope Dr. Fabiab Wittmers can root out more fraudulent papers in the medical field. God bless you.
September 20, 2025 at 4:01 AM
These papers have held up patients' treatment and misled doctors. This kind of behavior is no less than robbing people and endangering their lives. Hope Dr. Fabiab Wittmers can root out more fraudulent papers in the medical field. God bless you.
September 16, 2025 at 6:58 PM
He's a celebrity scientist too, but Dr. Fabian Wittmers totally debunked these myths. Thanks for what you do! I think you should keep digging into this—you might find even more, haha.
September 13, 2025 at 7:02 AM
He's a celebrity scientist too, but Dr. Fabian Wittmers totally debunked these myths. Thanks for what you do! I think you should keep digging into this—you might find even more, haha.
Again, thanks for Dr. Fabian Wittmers’ work. God bless you.
September 10, 2025 at 5:11 AM
Again, thanks for Dr. Fabian Wittmers’ work. God bless you.
This sort of thing—those authors must have done it a lot. I bet all their related papers are problematic. Thanks so much to Dr. Fabian Wittmers for taking all that time to get to the bottom of these issues. You’ll probably need to spend even more time looking into their papers.
September 10, 2025 at 5:11 AM
This sort of thing—those authors must have done it a lot. I bet all their related papers are problematic. Thanks so much to Dr. Fabian Wittmers for taking all that time to get to the bottom of these issues. You’ll probably need to spend even more time looking into their papers.
The scary thing is, almost all the papers published in this journal are related to drugs and treatments. These papers could mislead a lot of patients and doctors.
Dr. Fabian Wittmers' work has pointed doctors and patients in the right direction. God bless you.
Dr. Fabian Wittmers' work has pointed doctors and patients in the right direction. God bless you.
August 31, 2025 at 3:57 AM
The scary thing is, almost all the papers published in this journal are related to drugs and treatments. These papers could mislead a lot of patients and doctors.
Dr. Fabian Wittmers' work has pointed doctors and patients in the right direction. God bless you.
Dr. Fabian Wittmers' work has pointed doctors and patients in the right direction. God bless you.
Hey, my thing is, I wanna keep commercial outfits from misusing the work those academic detectives do.
August 5, 2025 at 7:17 AM
Hey, my thing is, I wanna keep commercial outfits from misusing the work those academic detectives do.
Hey there, Dr. Cheshire,
My Chinese buddy told me there are some commercial outfits misusing what the detectives come up with. They repost stuff from PubPeer and then claim they can fix the issues—like doing full paper checks, churning out reports, and even guiding folks on how to correct things.
My Chinese buddy told me there are some commercial outfits misusing what the detectives come up with. They repost stuff from PubPeer and then claim they can fix the issues—like doing full paper checks, churning out reports, and even guiding folks on how to correct things.
August 5, 2025 at 7:11 AM
Hey there, Dr. Cheshire,
My Chinese buddy told me there are some commercial outfits misusing what the detectives come up with. They repost stuff from PubPeer and then claim they can fix the issues—like doing full paper checks, churning out reports, and even guiding folks on how to correct things.
My Chinese buddy told me there are some commercial outfits misusing what the detectives come up with. They repost stuff from PubPeer and then claim they can fix the issues—like doing full paper checks, churning out reports, and even guiding folks on how to correct things.
Lol, Dr. Fabian Wittmers, you could mention copyright on your PubPeer posts—like, that folks need your okay to repost 'em. Might cut down on a lot of this stuff.
August 5, 2025 at 6:42 AM
Lol, Dr. Fabian Wittmers, you could mention copyright on your PubPeer posts—like, that folks need your okay to repost 'em. Might cut down on a lot of this stuff.
I’m not a native English speaker. I’ll draft my English replies in Word first, then get back to you. haha
August 5, 2025 at 4:20 AM
I’m not a native English speaker. I’ll draft my English replies in Word first, then get back to you. haha
From what I hear, they’ll do drawings and simulations to get high-res images for the paper. All the author has to do is provide the replacement images, and that’s it.
But hey, this is just something I heard through the grapevine—I don’t even know if it’s true.
But hey, this is just something I heard through the grapevine—I don’t even know if it’s true.
August 5, 2025 at 4:18 AM
From what I hear, they’ll do drawings and simulations to get high-res images for the paper. All the author has to do is provide the replacement images, and that’s it.
But hey, this is just something I heard through the grapevine—I don’t even know if it’s true.
But hey, this is just something I heard through the grapevine—I don’t even know if it’s true.
Chances are publishers will get experts to review it.
August 5, 2025 at 4:17 AM
Chances are publishers will get experts to review it.
Besides that, it seems like there are these third-party correction services in China. A lot of WeChat official accounts repost stuff from PubPeer, and then use that to offer authors full-text image plagiarism checks and final correction services.
August 5, 2025 at 4:16 AM
Besides that, it seems like there are these third-party correction services in China. A lot of WeChat official accounts repost stuff from PubPeer, and then use that to offer authors full-text image plagiarism checks and final correction services.
I once had a paper get flagged. The publisher’s investigation process was pretty straightforward: provide the original images from the paper, explain what caused the error, then just swap out the image—done.
August 5, 2025 at 4:15 AM
I once had a paper get flagged. The publisher’s investigation process was pretty straightforward: provide the original images from the paper, explain what caused the error, then just swap out the image—done.
Dr. Fabian Wittmer might need to spend a ton of time identifying these papers. Will that cut into your work hours?
August 1, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Dr. Fabian Wittmer might need to spend a ton of time identifying these papers. Will that cut into your work hours?
Thanks a ton for all the work you do, by the way. I know a bit about nanoparticles myself, and honestly? I think most of their supposed uses in biomedicine are pretty much bogus.
August 1, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Thanks a ton for all the work you do, by the way. I know a bit about nanoparticles myself, and honestly? I think most of their supposed uses in biomedicine are pretty much bogus.