Not calling anyone out js perhaps its unfair to call an unfollow "dehumanizing" 🤷
A lot of what it comes down to is how folks define tasteful lewd art vs nsfw. Sometimes its just easier to unfollow than force someone to change for you in ways they shouldnt have to imo.

To be fair, some of yall suck at tagging your content as nsfw! I already use the hide feature and still have to be careful ab when and where I open this app cuz only like 70% gets hidden.

The non transparent use of bots in sw should be legally considered rape by deception imo.

Been saying this forever! Especially creeps me out when I see dudes making gifs of camgirls under the guise of advertising without prior permision. Just once, id like to see a model call them out for the piracy.

Pages like yours tbh. They were ok when I first started out. Now, ik enough ab the industry to realize most your strategies are just classist rhetoric dressed up as pro-sw views.
Funny how a self proclaimed ceo would have views like yours knowing less ppl would do sw if payed living wages.

At its most benign, it may represent a superficial and insincere form of solidarity. Heres why:

A lot of ppl just have the unrealistic expectation that everything needs to be some kinda pun in dnd I think 🤷 I dont think its a fair critism I just get where it comes from.

Most names for irl cities are dry and uninteresting so not faulting anyone for using one. Especially if its just a side gig

Well yeah but whats the lore behind Harbor City? Does it perhaps"harbor" dangerous secrets? Or is it just a regular port city? That's what seperates a good name from an uncreative and dry name for a dnd city imho. Think thats what they probably meant by it.

They're not wrong but they aint right.
My favorite naming conventions follow the story of a towns development. High Walls for a city district name with well, high walls lol not cuz its a prison but just a slum at the base of multiple sky scrapers built that way to conceal its eye sores from nobles.

Im just as sketched out by your block lists as I am all the rest.

That, to me, is a convo worth having. Based on what ive seen, sex work might as well already be legal/decriminalized - just only for the rich. I increasingly find myself of the opinion that sw should be so normalized that privacy is no longer necessary on the client side to act as a shield for pedos

I dont like to fan the flames of anti sw views. However I do think theres a grey area in the law, combined with a self interest in curating high paying clients as a sw, and a perverse use of privacy granted by online anonymity to hide questionable behavior, thats can fairly be called trafficking...

Blink? No. Silently walk away never to come back? Yes.
Im all for SW having guidance and resourcing to succeed. But this page? Takes an extremely classist approach.

Purposefully curating higher paying clients as you go isn't a bad strat. Purposefully curating out decent ppl in favor of higher paying clients however, sounds like some super classist nonsense.

The nervously highstrung and obviously in pain part is what 💀 me tbh... anyone else, I would generally look at the shirt and be like "damn, I need them on my team!" but with this guy I just genuinely felt bad for em 😔