FWIW I talk more about that in the link below.
deck16.net/post/7214788...
FWIW I talk more about that in the link below.
deck16.net/post/7214788...
From what I gather, you're trying to run 1-hour one-shot games?
Neither edition of PF will be a good fit. I think you could do it, but I think you could find much simpler TTRPGs to better work with that time limit.
From what I gather, you're trying to run 1-hour one-shot games?
Neither edition of PF will be a good fit. I think you could do it, but I think you could find much simpler TTRPGs to better work with that time limit.
Archives on Nethys has all the rules content for Pathfinder First and Second Editions. Legally and for free.
2e.aonprd.com/PlayersGuide...
Archives on Nethys has all the rules content for Pathfinder First and Second Editions. Legally and for free.
2e.aonprd.com/PlayersGuide...
Some time pressure? The party may have to pick and choose when to rest. Make encounters a little easier.
Extreme time pressure? There's no 10 minutes to be had! Make encounters considerably easier.
Some time pressure? The party may have to pick and choose when to rest. Make encounters a little easier.
Extreme time pressure? There's no 10 minutes to be had! Make encounters considerably easier.
With care, the balance works in all cases.
The GM just has to turn the "resting dial"...
With care, the balance works in all cases.
The GM just has to turn the "resting dial"...
I do instigate other systems, but at a glacial pace. I'd love to try out more different systems but my "TTRPG bandwidth" is saturated with GMing ongoing PF2e games. Doesn't help that I quite like long-running campaigns.
If someone else offers, though, I'm down for whatever. 👍
Except FATAL. 🤮
I do instigate other systems, but at a glacial pace. I'd love to try out more different systems but my "TTRPG bandwidth" is saturated with GMing ongoing PF2e games. Doesn't help that I quite like long-running campaigns.
If someone else offers, though, I'm down for whatever. 👍
Except FATAL. 🤮
I don't know if Paizo love or hate the fact that fans (like me) will take any opportunity to spruik the system's "freeness".
Guessing again, but I suspect they'd like it.
I don't know if Paizo love or hate the fact that fans (like me) will take any opportunity to spruik the system's "freeness".
Guessing again, but I suspect they'd like it.
Some of those customers will play for free, but many will buy stuff.
At least, that's what I suspect the thinking is.
Some of those customers will play for free, but many will buy stuff.
At least, that's what I suspect the thinking is.
If you've looked with an open mind at other TTRPG systems (not just PF of course), and ultimately chosen D&D because of circumstance or preference, you're alright by me. 👍
I would humbly hope you aren't feeding the beast with a D&D Beyond sub or such, though. 😧
If you've looked with an open mind at other TTRPG systems (not just PF of course), and ultimately chosen D&D because of circumstance or preference, you're alright by me. 👍
I would humbly hope you aren't feeding the beast with a D&D Beyond sub or such, though. 😧
Example:
You can play Pathfinder 2e for free, legally. And not just a cut-back "basic" version. All the game's rules, including add-on material, is legally and freely online.
Then there's Pathbuilder and the PF2e system for Foundry VTT: both free and legally so.
Example:
You can play Pathfinder 2e for free, legally. And not just a cut-back "basic" version. All the game's rules, including add-on material, is legally and freely online.
Then there's Pathbuilder and the PF2e system for Foundry VTT: both free and legally so.
If you were writing this material, how would you do it differently?
If you were writing this material, how would you do it differently?
I have a terrible memory of Ghazghkull and a heap of orks totally surrounding a lone Space Marine captain in melee... and all eventually dying.
That was Second Edition? Against a player who knew the rules well & how to really leverage them.
I have a terrible memory of Ghazghkull and a heap of orks totally surrounding a lone Space Marine captain in melee... and all eventually dying.
That was Second Edition? Against a player who knew the rules well & how to really leverage them.
A nice, friendly min-maxer's only potential problem -- that I can think of -- is being an Angel Summoner.
A nice, friendly min-maxer's only potential problem -- that I can think of -- is being an Angel Summoner.
Absolutely it could happen in D&D 3.5e or PF1e though.
Absolutely it could happen in D&D 3.5e or PF1e though.
It's often not fun to play as a character alongside another character who is considerably more powerful. Not (just) because of jealousy. More relevantly, because one doesn't contribute.
It's often not fun to play as a character alongside another character who is considerably more powerful. Not (just) because of jealousy. More relevantly, because one doesn't contribute.
But min-maxing can be a problem...
But min-maxing can be a problem...
One potential tip: intersperse the PC epilogues (which I asked the players to tell) between the NPC epilogues.
One potential tip: intersperse the PC epilogues (which I asked the players to tell) between the NPC epilogues.
I was curious as some people use AI for "assistive" reasons like help with a language they're not fluent in, or ameliorating a disability.
You clearly explained your stance though. Thank you!
I was curious as some people use AI for "assistive" reasons like help with a language they're not fluent in, or ameliorating a disability.
You clearly explained your stance though. Thank you!
I understand the gentle enforcement goal here. I am curious if this is a zero-tolerance policy?
What would you do if you found, for example, an ESL player used AI not to write a backstory, but check it for grammar and clarity?
I understand the gentle enforcement goal here. I am curious if this is a zero-tolerance policy?
What would you do if you found, for example, an ESL player used AI not to write a backstory, but check it for grammar and clarity?
As for the idea there are too many for "the world"? Nonsense. In the words of The Hon. Bob Kattar MP "Let there be a thousand blossoms bloom".
As for the idea there are too many for "the world"? Nonsense. In the words of The Hon. Bob Kattar MP "Let there be a thousand blossoms bloom".
That said, I am not a one-system GM. Just that I GM new systems at a glacially slow pace.
That said, I am not a one-system GM. Just that I GM new systems at a glacially slow pace.
That said, I do write TTRPG stuff in HTML. Commit to GitHub and host freely. See rpg.deck16.net. I can access on PC, on phone, and can link others to it no issue.
Easy for me because of my career. Easy for others? 🤷
That said, I do write TTRPG stuff in HTML. Commit to GitHub and host freely. See rpg.deck16.net. I can access on PC, on phone, and can link others to it no issue.
Easy for me because of my career. Easy for others? 🤷
The key is that consumers aren't blinded by branding & are aware of their choices.
But yeah... there are better systems. 😉
The key is that consumers aren't blinded by branding & are aware of their choices.
But yeah... there are better systems. 😉