Someone living in poverty has exactly zero moral obligation not to just take what they need

Why can't we edit posts

*Of poverty godammit

Someone living in poverty has exactly zero moral obligation not to just take what they need

libertarians even when they're not social reactionaries is that treating property as an absolute right and ethical ends in itself is such a wildly stupid and horrible ethical framework.

unequal terms. Like I'm not a communist because I think trade is fine and property can be a useful tool for securing individual autonomy from the community but any remotely ethical system of property has to take the destruction of property as a precondition. One of my biggest problems with

No.

Damn that's kinda morbid but I guess if it's literal Nazis it's not that bad lol

What's the point in meat if something doesn't have to die and suffer right? That's the "natural" way after all and we all know nature could never be horrible and fucked up or anything. And just ignore that the "natural" process usually happens in industrial farms that maximize cruelty