mads ‼️💜 | famsky trianually 🫶🏻
@cxrdboardcxstles.bsky.social
she/they | professional playlist maker || 21 || profile art by disparity / agnes | 🍉 free palestine
I KID YOU NOT I DID A WHOLE THREAD ON HERE BC OF A PROSHIPPER FFS
January 26, 2026 at 8:31 PM
I KID YOU NOT I DID A WHOLE THREAD ON HERE BC OF A PROSHIPPER FFS
TL;DR: White proship creator claims criticizing romanticized abuse = white supremacy, deletes POC who disagree, uses racial slurs, weaponizes anti-racist frameworks, reveals complete intellectual bankruptcy and actual racist behavior.
Don't let this bullshit slide.
Don't let this bullshit slide.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
TL;DR: White proship creator claims criticizing romanticized abuse = white supremacy, deletes POC who disagree, uses racial slurs, weaponizes anti-racist frameworks, reveals complete intellectual bankruptcy and actual racist behavior.
Don't let this bullshit slide.
Don't let this bullshit slide.
And Shan: Deleting POC voices while claiming to fight white supremacy, using racial slurs while claiming anti-racism, silencing critics while claiming to support discussion, and weaponizing marginalized communities you don't represent...
That's white supremacy. You're doing it.
That's white supremacy. You're doing it.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
And Shan: Deleting POC voices while claiming to fight white supremacy, using racial slurs while claiming anti-racism, silencing critics while claiming to support discussion, and weaponizing marginalized communities you don't represent...
That's white supremacy. You're doing it.
That's white supremacy. You're doing it.
Stop letting white proshippers weaponize anti-racism to defend romanticized abuse. Stop letting them silence POC voices. Stop letting them appropriate frameworks about oppression. Stop letting them get away with projection.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Stop letting white proshippers weaponize anti-racism to defend romanticized abuse. Stop letting them silence POC voices. Stop letting them appropriate frameworks about oppression. Stop letting them get away with projection.
If you're being told that criticizing romanticized abuse makes you a white supremacist by a white woman who's deleting POC voices, you're not the problem.
If you're a POC being silenced while a white woman claims to fight for you, you're witnessing racism in real-time.
If you're a POC being silenced while a white woman claims to fight for you, you're witnessing racism in real-time.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
If you're being told that criticizing romanticized abuse makes you a white supremacist by a white woman who's deleting POC voices, you're not the problem.
If you're a POC being silenced while a white woman claims to fight for you, you're witnessing racism in real-time.
If you're a POC being silenced while a white woman claims to fight for you, you're witnessing racism in real-time.
Final thoughts:
- You can oppose KOSA and legal censorship
- AND critique romanticized abuse content
- AND recognize Shan's argument is racist garbage
- AND center actual POC voices
- AND maintain intellectual integrity
- You can oppose KOSA and legal censorship
- AND critique romanticized abuse content
- AND recognize Shan's argument is racist garbage
- AND center actual POC voices
- AND maintain intellectual integrity
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Final thoughts:
- You can oppose KOSA and legal censorship
- AND critique romanticized abuse content
- AND recognize Shan's argument is racist garbage
- AND center actual POC voices
- AND maintain intellectual integrity
- You can oppose KOSA and legal censorship
- AND critique romanticized abuse content
- AND recognize Shan's argument is racist garbage
- AND center actual POC voices
- AND maintain intellectual integrity
To anyone who agreed with Shan's earlier reasonable takes then felt whiplash when she went off the rails: That's the bait-and-switch. Hook you with "consenting adults" then pivot to "critics are white supremacists." It's deliberate.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
To anyone who agreed with Shan's earlier reasonable takes then felt whiplash when she went off the rails: That's the bait-and-switch. Hook you with "consenting adults" then pivot to "critics are white supremacists." It's deliberate.
To POC who Shan deleted/blocked: Your voices matter. You were right to call out her bullshit. A white woman doesn't get to tell you what is/isn't white supremacy, then silence you when you disagree. That's literally white supremacy in action.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
To POC who Shan deleted/blocked: Your voices matter. You were right to call out her bullshit. A white woman doesn't get to tell you what is/isn't white supremacy, then silence you when you disagree. That's literally white supremacy in action.
When you weaponize "white supremacy" to defend romanticized abuse content, you make it harder to address ACTUAL white supremacy in fandom:
- Racism in characterization
- Ships with POC being disrespected
- POC fans being silenced
- White fans dominating spaces
- Racism in characterization
- Ships with POC being disrespected
- POC fans being silenced
- White fans dominating spaces
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
When you weaponize "white supremacy" to defend romanticized abuse content, you make it harder to address ACTUAL white supremacy in fandom:
- Racism in characterization
- Ships with POC being disrespected
- POC fans being silenced
- White fans dominating spaces
- Racism in characterization
- Ships with POC being disrespected
- POC fans being silenced
- White fans dominating spaces
What's most galling: Shan appropriates frameworks designed to address actual oppression (white supremacy, colonization, marginalized communities) and uses them to defend romanticized depictions of incest, rape, and child abuse dynamics.
This trivializes actual racism.
This trivializes actual racism.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
What's most galling: Shan appropriates frameworks designed to address actual oppression (white supremacy, colonization, marginalized communities) and uses them to defend romanticized depictions of incest, rape, and child abuse dynamics.
This trivializes actual racism.
This trivializes actual racism.
Meanwhile, she's reportedly sending her followers to mass-report people criticizing her, calling it "hate trains" and "harassment."
Using your platform to again sic followers on critics while claiming to oppose harassment is... well, it's on-brand for this level of projection.
Using your platform to again sic followers on critics while claiming to oppose harassment is... well, it's on-brand for this level of projection.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Meanwhile, she's reportedly sending her followers to mass-report people criticizing her, calling it "hate trains" and "harassment."
Using your platform to again sic followers on critics while claiming to oppose harassment is... well, it's on-brand for this level of projection.
Using your platform to again sic followers on critics while claiming to oppose harassment is... well, it's on-brand for this level of projection.
Here's what Shan is actually doing:
- WHITE woman weaponizing anti-racism to defend romanticized abuse
- SILENCING POC who disagree
- CENTERING her white voice as authority on racism
- USING progressive language to avoid accountability
- HARMING actual marginalized folks
- WHITE woman weaponizing anti-racism to defend romanticized abuse
- SILENCING POC who disagree
- CENTERING her white voice as authority on racism
- USING progressive language to avoid accountability
- HARMING actual marginalized folks
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Here's what Shan is actually doing:
- WHITE woman weaponizing anti-racism to defend romanticized abuse
- SILENCING POC who disagree
- CENTERING her white voice as authority on racism
- USING progressive language to avoid accountability
- HARMING actual marginalized folks
- WHITE woman weaponizing anti-racism to defend romanticized abuse
- SILENCING POC who disagree
- CENTERING her white voice as authority on racism
- USING progressive language to avoid accountability
- HARMING actual marginalized folks
The "you're secretly into it" argument only works if these desires are SHAMEFUL. But Shan also claims they're normal, fine, just kinks, nothing wrong with them.
So which is it? If they're fine, why is accusing someone of having them an insult? The contradiction reveals everything.
So which is it? If they're fine, why is accusing someone of having them an insult? The contradiction reveals everything.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
The "you're secretly into it" argument only works if these desires are SHAMEFUL. But Shan also claims they're normal, fine, just kinks, nothing wrong with them.
So which is it? If they're fine, why is accusing someone of having them an insult? The contradiction reveals everything.
So which is it? If they're fine, why is accusing someone of having them an insult? The contradiction reveals everything.
She also loves claiming "antis are secretly into the stuff they criticize." This is:
- Homophobic logic (same used against LGBTQ+ people)
- Rape culture framing ("she said no but really wants it")
- Gaslighting (telling people they don't know their own desires)
- Unfalsifiable
- Homophobic logic (same used against LGBTQ+ people)
- Rape culture framing ("she said no but really wants it")
- Gaslighting (telling people they don't know their own desires)
- Unfalsifiable
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
She also loves claiming "antis are secretly into the stuff they criticize." This is:
- Homophobic logic (same used against LGBTQ+ people)
- Rape culture framing ("she said no but really wants it")
- Gaslighting (telling people they don't know their own desires)
- Unfalsifiable
- Homophobic logic (same used against LGBTQ+ people)
- Rape culture framing ("she said no but really wants it")
- Gaslighting (telling people they don't know their own desires)
- Unfalsifiable
Shan wants it both ways:
- "Fiction doesn't affect reality" (when defending content)
- "Fiction DOES affect reality" (when claiming criticism leads to censorship)
- "What you create reveals nothing" (ageplay)
- "What you criticize reveals everything" (critics are fragile)
Pick a fucking side.
- "Fiction doesn't affect reality" (when defending content)
- "Fiction DOES affect reality" (when claiming criticism leads to censorship)
- "What you create reveals nothing" (ageplay)
- "What you criticize reveals everything" (critics are fragile)
Pick a fucking side.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Shan wants it both ways:
- "Fiction doesn't affect reality" (when defending content)
- "Fiction DOES affect reality" (when claiming criticism leads to censorship)
- "What you create reveals nothing" (ageplay)
- "What you criticize reveals everything" (critics are fragile)
Pick a fucking side.
- "Fiction doesn't affect reality" (when defending content)
- "Fiction DOES affect reality" (when claiming criticism leads to censorship)
- "What you create reveals nothing" (ageplay)
- "What you criticize reveals everything" (critics are fragile)
Pick a fucking side.
The question isn't "are the physical bodies adults?" It's "why is mimicking a toddler sexually appealing?" Just like with fiction: "why are you attracted to depictions of children?"
The concerning part is what's being eroticized, not the legal technicalities.
The concerning part is what's being eroticized, not the legal technicalities.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
The question isn't "are the physical bodies adults?" It's "why is mimicking a toddler sexually appealing?" Just like with fiction: "why are you attracted to depictions of children?"
The concerning part is what's being eroticized, not the legal technicalities.
The concerning part is what's being eroticized, not the legal technicalities.
Shan also argued that "ageplay can't be compared to pedophilia because it involves no real children, just two consenting adults."
Cool. So by that logic, fictional content also "involves no real children," so why is she defending it so hard? Pick a consistent standard.
Cool. So by that logic, fictional content also "involves no real children," so why is she defending it so hard? Pick a consistent standard.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Shan also argued that "ageplay can't be compared to pedophilia because it involves no real children, just two consenting adults."
Cool. So by that logic, fictional content also "involves no real children," so why is she defending it so hard? Pick a consistent standard.
Cool. So by that logic, fictional content also "involves no real children," so why is she defending it so hard? Pick a consistent standard.
The projection is systematic. Every accusation is a confession:
Accuses critics of: white supremacy, savior complex, demanding comfort, colonizing spaces, silencing marginalized voices
While doing: ALL OF THOSE THINGS HERSELF
Accuses critics of: white supremacy, savior complex, demanding comfort, colonizing spaces, silencing marginalized voices
While doing: ALL OF THOSE THINGS HERSELF
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
The projection is systematic. Every accusation is a confession:
Accuses critics of: white supremacy, savior complex, demanding comfort, colonizing spaces, silencing marginalized voices
While doing: ALL OF THOSE THINGS HERSELF
Accuses critics of: white supremacy, savior complex, demanding comfort, colonizing spaces, silencing marginalized voices
While doing: ALL OF THOSE THINGS HERSELF
This is a pattern with Shan:
- Can't defend content on merits
- Weaponizes progressive frameworks instead
- Claims critics are fascists/white supremacists/conservatives
- Silences actual marginalized people who disagree
- Doubles down when caught
- Can't defend content on merits
- Weaponizes progressive frameworks instead
- Claims critics are fascists/white supremacists/conservatives
- Silences actual marginalized people who disagree
- Doubles down when caught
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
This is a pattern with Shan:
- Can't defend content on merits
- Weaponizes progressive frameworks instead
- Claims critics are fascists/white supremacists/conservatives
- Silences actual marginalized people who disagree
- Doubles down when caught
- Can't defend content on merits
- Weaponizes progressive frameworks instead
- Claims critics are fascists/white supremacists/conservatives
- Silences actual marginalized people who disagree
- Doubles down when caught
Shelley's summary: "Everything said in that video is a grasp at trying to sound as morally correct as possible when the topic at hand is rape and incest fan fiction." Strip away the social justice language and you're left with: defending romanticized abuse content.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Shelley's summary: "Everything said in that video is a grasp at trying to sound as morally correct as possible when the topic at hand is rape and incest fan fiction." Strip away the social justice language and you're left with: defending romanticized abuse content.
"If you're so pro-discussion, pro-open, anti-censorship, turn your fucking comments back on."
Shan has comments off/moderated, deletes disagreement, blocks critics. She claims to support open discussion while preventing it. Classic.
Shan has comments off/moderated, deletes disagreement, blocks critics. She claims to support open discussion while preventing it. Classic.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
"If you're so pro-discussion, pro-open, anti-censorship, turn your fucking comments back on."
Shan has comments off/moderated, deletes disagreement, blocks critics. She claims to support open discussion while preventing it. Classic.
Shan has comments off/moderated, deletes disagreement, blocks critics. She claims to support open discussion while preventing it. Classic.
Shelley also noted: "When a person of color calls you out, you publicly put them on blast, give out their Twitter handle, say 'happy blocking.'"
Shan is using her platform to sic followers on critics while claiming to be anti-harassment. The hypocrisy is staggering.
Shan is using her platform to sic followers on critics while claiming to be anti-harassment. The hypocrisy is staggering.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Shelley also noted: "When a person of color calls you out, you publicly put them on blast, give out their Twitter handle, say 'happy blocking.'"
Shan is using her platform to sic followers on critics while claiming to be anti-harassment. The hypocrisy is staggering.
Shan is using her platform to sic followers on critics while claiming to be anti-harassment. The hypocrisy is staggering.
Shelley continued: "It is not, like, a cultural thing for Koreans or Japanese people to wanna fuck their brothers."
This cuts through the racist "it's a cultural difference" defense some proshippers use. That's orientalism and it's gross.
This cuts through the racist "it's a cultural difference" defense some proshippers use. That's orientalism and it's gross.
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Shelley continued: "It is not, like, a cultural thing for Koreans or Japanese people to wanna fuck their brothers."
This cuts through the racist "it's a cultural difference" defense some proshippers use. That's orientalism and it's gross.
This cuts through the racist "it's a cultural difference" defense some proshippers use. That's orientalism and it's gross.
Another creator, Shelley (also white, but actually calling out bullshit) put it perfectly: "Talking about things like the right to comfort in context of white supremacy and then extrapolating that to somehow apply to your rape fan fiction is batshit crazy."
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Another creator, Shelley (also white, but actually calling out bullshit) put it perfectly: "Talking about things like the right to comfort in context of white supremacy and then extrapolating that to somehow apply to your rape fan fiction is batshit crazy."
The ACTUAL concerning dynamic:
- Predominantly white community defends romanticized abuse
- Diverse critics express concerns
- White creator tells them they're white supremacists
- Deletes POC voices
- Claims she's protecting marginalized people
- Predominantly white community defends romanticized abuse
- Diverse critics express concerns
- White creator tells them they're white supremacists
- Deletes POC voices
- Claims she's protecting marginalized people
January 23, 2026 at 9:19 AM
The ACTUAL concerning dynamic:
- Predominantly white community defends romanticized abuse
- Diverse critics express concerns
- White creator tells them they're white supremacists
- Deletes POC voices
- Claims she's protecting marginalized people
- Predominantly white community defends romanticized abuse
- Diverse critics express concerns
- White creator tells them they're white supremacists
- Deletes POC voices
- Claims she's protecting marginalized people