Carl Vondrick
@cvondrick.bsky.social
Professor at Columbia. Computer Vision and Machine Learning
Hard to say anything conclusive right now. When we investigated low quality reviews, the review was more often in the control group (anecdotal impression).
But there are whole categories of issues that the feedback agent wasn't looking for. I think actively looking for them would have helped.
But there are whole categories of issues that the feedback agent wasn't looking for. I think actively looking for them would have helped.
November 25, 2024 at 3:04 PM
Hard to say anything conclusive right now. When we investigated low quality reviews, the review was more often in the control group (anecdotal impression).
But there are whole categories of issues that the feedback agent wasn't looking for. I think actively looking for them would have helped.
But there are whole categories of issues that the feedback agent wasn't looking for. I think actively looking for them would have helped.
We evaluated this while planning ICLR 25, but decided against it because it disproportionately harms students. Senior researchers are the ones submitting multiple papers.
November 24, 2024 at 5:31 PM
We evaluated this while planning ICLR 25, but decided against it because it disproportionately harms students. Senior researchers are the ones submitting multiple papers.
We sent a reminder email to reviewers today - you could also reply to your response in a few days to ping the reviewers. That will trigger an email reply to the reviewers.
November 22, 2024 at 2:21 AM
We sent a reminder email to reviewers today - you could also reply to your response in a few days to ping the reviewers. That will trigger an email reply to the reviewers.