chestnuts, oaks, tulip trees, pawpaws, and persimmons 😉👍🏻

en.theanarchistlibrary.org/library/flow...

it's about the land and the biome and it's freedom to exist; it's not about race.

So locals necessarily Have to step out and protect this land from further destruction. there's virtually no one here defending it. All of us have abandoned the planet

this work does not belong sorry to native peoples, it *can't*, we are all here and we are all responsible for this liberation

that is always the implication ? Like, this is the quiet part I'm always seeing and I feel like it's necessary everyone has work to do here.

Where I live there is an old growth forest being destroyed under the guise of '''development''' and the nearest reserve is on the other side of the state

you don't seem to understand the punk part at all; aesthetics are not shallow things and signify much greater subcultures of resistance and rebellion and camaraderie that exist in their own ways

i see you as aligned with me in that even if you aren't *punk*

these moves need populations behind them

I was trying 2 address a misconception and bridge what I perceived as an unnecessary gap here

isn't it true that we're all meant to do this work? isn't it true that the liberation of the land from colonization is the goal of land back? isn't it true that this fight involves everyone?

hey there ^•^

this is not @ing anyone at all btw not you soil-builder and not anyone reading this I am simply expressing a deeply known truth about the matter I think is worth sharing; we racialize land back way too much & unconsciously; land back is about liberating the land from possession and sterilization.