Nathan Jeffery
banner
ctrl-n.bsky.social
Nathan Jeffery
@ctrl-n.bsky.social
Professional nerd, amateur artist, and gamer. RStats, Shiny, Quarto, etc. Opinions = mine. He/him 🌈
Many of my colleagues have limited Shiny experience, and I wanted a debugging option that was as simple and legible as possible.
September 25, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I use this in a shiny app! 'debug' is a list containing items for whether to 'write_rds' files to a debug folder after major data cleaning steps and/or 'print' debug messages (to the console and/or a .txt file, using the logger pkg)
September 25, 2025 at 10:46 AM
If it's a data frame in a function, it's called `dat`.

If it's a data frame I'm prototyping something with, it might also be called `dat`. Or `foo` or `bar`.
September 25, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Yeah, this feels like a job for brand.yml and some nice code templates
September 18, 2025 at 4:58 PM
I loved hearing your talk today. What a useful and thoughtful package. Thank you for sharing it with us!
September 18, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Growing up, my grandma had an oblong kitchen table. Wasn't til today that I looked it up though!

Apparently "oblong" is just generic for "a stretched out square or circle"?

IDK
August 31, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Does some of this functionality depend on Shiny version 1.11 to update if module files are changed?
August 25, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Hey, I'm sorry. My bad for misunderstanding you.
August 22, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Pak is so fast!
August 16, 2025 at 10:03 PM
I agree that aesthetically it looks better and highlights that the foreground data is smaller, but I think for making sense of the graph, the only justifiable options are having the foreground bins the same width or half the width of the background
August 12, 2025 at 6:27 PM
And the more we discuss the humanness of intelligence, the ways we can see and cultivate it,

The more it becomes blindingly obvious that (a) we deserve better out of our education system, and (b) AI isn't all it's cracked up to be.

end/
August 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
Would I go to college again?
Yes.

But I've seen enough blindingly intelligent people without PhDs (and a handful of "meh" people with them) to know that "PhD level intelligence" ... isn't entirely a function of having a PhD.

6/
August 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
Should we encourage people to learn to write more clearly? Yes.

To read? Definitely.
To collaborate? Absolutely.
To develop a passion? Of course.

Is college or a PhD the best place to do that?

I'm not sure. It's a good one, but it's not the dream I was led to believe it would be.

5/
August 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
And frankly, dissertations suck. If you wrote one, you should definitely be proud of getting through the research, the red tape, the revisions, the pages and pages of writing. It's a feat.

But I don't delude myself that I would be more intelligent if I had written one.

4/
August 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
Do I think better, write more clearly, know more facts, and have more empathy than when I started my PhD? Yes.

Did school help develop those things? Absolutely.

But a PhD is only one way to structure the effort, rigor, care, and feedback that lead to intelligence (however we define it)

3/
August 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
dichotomy of "intelligence as regurgitating facts" vs "intelligence as an ability honed in college, especially during a PhD."

As someone who just left a PhD program (and works with lots of folks with PhDs): we can't be holding the PhD up as the pinnacle of intelligence.

2/
August 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
This is my favorite!
August 11, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Ugh I hate those
August 11, 2025 at 1:58 AM
I wonder if Cobol is in line with what you're looking for?

Admittedly, you have decades more experience than I do with this, so while I'm interested in your query, I don't have much by way of suggestion.

On the off chance you're into audio synthesis, I've heard SuperCollider is solid.
August 11, 2025 at 1:57 AM