by "weak force" i meant, the force of weakness or power of weakness*

"supplement" = "proxy"

Who doesn't hate what doesn't exist but keeps speaking? who doesn't love what doesn't exist but keeps speaking?

The other reason why so many are disgusted by "Zelensky" (those who never heard of UA ever) is that they believe he doesn't exist and is only a supplement to what is real (globalists, deep state, etc). This supplement shouldn't be able to speak, it has to keep inexisting.

I don't know her overall argument, but when she writes: "the everyday domain of human understanding," isn't she essentializing it as if it really operates in the realm of the visible? Isn't the visible has to be given to us necessarily against the background of the invisible?