Cryptography, FP, Math, and other cool stuff.
Blog too infrequently at cronokirby.com
Lost in Seattle somewhere
It should be easy to show that your DFS continues to do meaningful work, in that it won't visit old nodes again
It should be easy to show that your DFS continues to do meaningful work, in that it won't visit old nodes again
- there's often a myopic focus on impact during construction (traffic theory of everything)
- preference seems to be doled out through restrictions of upzoning, which reduces land value (but, it can preserve property value, sometimes)
- there's often a myopic focus on impact during construction (traffic theory of everything)
- preference seems to be doled out through restrictions of upzoning, which reduces land value (but, it can preserve property value, sometimes)
That's way too much machinery for this book though.
That's way too much machinery for this book though.
It's budget / mill based, so a drop in property values would just change the distribution of taxation, not the intake.
It's budget / mill based, so a drop in property values would just change the distribution of taxation, not the intake.
This paper made me see it as a bit more of an interesting attack, in that they actually found examples of a ciphertext which would decrypt to two valid files with different keys.
It does remain a bit contrived to imagine key confusion, but software can be very buggy.
This paper made me see it as a bit more of an interesting attack, in that they actually found examples of a ciphertext which would decrypt to two valid files with different keys.
It does remain a bit contrived to imagine key confusion, but software can be very buggy.